On Wednesday, Oct 15, 2003, at 00:36 Europe/Rome, Conal Tuohy wrote:
But topics can also be safely created automatically in some cases:
where
good structured metadata exists we can confidently base
topics on it.
e.g.
topics can usefully be automatically harvested from Java
classes that
implement
On Monday, Oct 13, 2003, at 22:57 Europe/Rome, Conal Tuohy wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Some form of topic map would be useful to build what's
related info
though, which helps navigation and discovery a lot.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Yes, but such a topic maps would have to be human edited.
Stefano wrote:
automatic harvesting scares the crap out of me, Conal.
This is conceptually no different to harvesting JavaDoc tags from Java
source.
I agree that there must be some kind of automatism going on, but the
topic creation is a human task and programs would do a
terrible job at
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
...
automatic harvesting scares the crap out of me, Conal.
We will probably be moving the Forrest DTD to XHTML2 in one of the next
things to do. As you know, there are meta tags that are a nice way of
adding additional info in the page.
On Tuesday, Oct 14, 2003, at 20:42 Europe/Rome, Conal Tuohy wrote:
Stefano wrote:
automatic harvesting scares the crap out of me, Conal.
This is conceptually no different to harvesting JavaDoc tags from Java
source.
good point.
I agree that there must be some kind of automatism going on, but
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
We will probably be moving the Forrest DTD to XHTML2 in one
of the next
things to do. As you know, there are meta tags that are a
nice way of
adding additional info in the page.
http://academ.hvcc.edu/~kantopet/xhtml/index.php?page=xhtml+me
ta+content
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I agree that there must be some kind of automatism going
on, but the
topic creation is a human task and programs would do a
terrible job at
doing this.
The example I gave assumed precisely that a human editor
had written a
namespace topic; the harvester
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Conal Tuohy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
We will probably be moving the Forrest DTD to XHTML2 in one
of the next
things to do. As you know, there are meta tags
Le Dimanche, 12 oct 2003, à 17:55 Europe/Zurich, Stefano Mazzocchi a
écrit :
On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
Has anyone discussed how to impose an outline on a Wiki?
yes. there are some proposals on the table, ranging from simple to
futuristic
I think
On Monday, Oct 13, 2003, at 07:48 Europe/Rome, Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Hi Stefano!
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
The approach above works but it requires two operations:
1) creation of the LO
2) connection of the LO in the linkmap
Can you explain to me, why you are always talking from
On Monday, Oct 13, 2003, at 09:36 Europe/Rome, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
Le Dimanche, 12 oct 2003, à 17:55 Europe/Zurich, Stefano Mazzocchi a
écrit :
On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
Has anyone discussed how to impose an outline on a Wiki?
yes. there are
Le Lundi, 13 oct 2003, à 14:57 Europe/Zurich, Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit
:
...Some form of topic map would be useful to build what's related
info though, which helps navigation and discovery a lot.
Yes, but such a topic maps would have to be human edited. this is what
scares me. tools for
On Monday, Oct 13, 2003, at 15:12 Europe/Rome, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
Le Lundi, 13 oct 2003, à 14:57 Europe/Zurich, Stefano Mazzocchi a
écrit :
...Some form of topic map would be useful to build what's related
info though, which helps navigation and discovery a lot.
Yes, but such a topic
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Some form of topic map would be useful to build what's
related info
though, which helps navigation and discovery a lot.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Yes, but such a topic maps would have to be human edited.
this is what
scares me. tools for ontology creation (like
* Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-12 16:04]:
On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
The trouble with Wiki and docs is that new users, such as myself,
are going to look for a documentation outline. A good TOC and index
makes all the differnece in
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Sunday, Oct 12, 2003, at 16:13 Europe/Rome, Alan Gutierrez wrote:
The trouble with Wiki and docs is that new users, such as myself,
are going to look for a documentation outline. A good TOC and index
makes all the differnece in the world when searching documentation.
Hi Stefano!
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
The approach above works but it requires two operations:
1) creation of the LO
2) connection of the LO in the linkmap
Can you explain to me, why you are always talking from learning objects
in this context?
Isn't a learning object a bit too specific to
17 matches
Mail list logo
