Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ok, we guess we can continue this discussion forever :)
I like discussion :)
I would say, do what you think is better, we will see what
happens.
And this is not one of the April's fools day jokes? ;)
I'd leave it as it is and add it to the release
ins
Reinhard Pötz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> >Ok, we guess we can continue this discussion forever :) I
> would say, do
> >what you think is better, we will see what happens.
> >
> >
>
> +1
> Carsten, I like your pragmatic approaches ;-)
>
Thanks :) I know today
: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULT] javaflow
Torsten Curdt wrote:
but then I'd propose to disable *all* unstable blocks
Oh no, please not because this will lead to everyone wanting to
declare his favorite block &q
Ok, we guess we can continue this discussion forever :)
I would say, do what you think is better, we will see what
happens.
Carsten
> -Original Message-
> From: Reinhard Pötz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
Torsten Curdt wrote:
but then I'd propose to disable *all* unstable blocks
Oh no, please not because this will lead to everyone wanting to
declare his
favorite block "stable" :)
don't wanna bitch around but... if you
want prevent users to use unstable code
(or at least make them aware of the f
but then I'd propose to disable *all* unstable blocks
Oh no, please not because this will lead to everyone wanting to declare his
favorite block "stable" :)
don't wanna bitch around but... if you
want prevent users to use unstable code
(or at least make them aware of the fact)
we should handle blo
Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >
> > Rule No.1 in OS projects: NEVER TRUST THE RELEASE MANAGER!
>
> hehe ...you wanna shirk the responsibility ;) but I trust you
> anyway :)
>
Hey, it was worth a try :) Thanks!
> >>that he will not forget
> >>to change it when it is on his todo list for the release
Well, I personally think if someone is using our HEAD branch
and is missing which blocks are stable and which are not
...well, he should better go for the releases.
And I also trust our release manager
Rule No.1 in OS projects: NEVER TRUST THE RELEASE MANAGER!
hehe ...you wanna shirk the respon
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> Well, I personally think if someone is using our HEAD branch
> and is missing which blocks are stable and which are not
> ...well, he should better go for the releases.
>
> And I also trust our release manager
Rule No.1 in OS projects: NEVER TRUST THE RELEASE MANAGER!
Am Do, den 01.04.2004 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler um 9:02:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > > Is the block disabled by default?
> >
> > no not yet ...would you prefer this
> > also for the dev version or only for
> > the release?
>
> I personally would prefer to disable it already for
> the dev version a
Is the block disabled by default?
no not yet ...would you prefer this
also for the dev version or only for
the release?
I personally would prefer to disable it already for
the dev version as many users are trying out Cocoon
from the CVS and then only use later on a released
version as a r
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Is the block disabled by default?
no not yet ...would you prefer this
also for the dev version or only for
the release?
I personally would prefer to disable it already for
the dev version as many users are trying out Cocoon
from the CVS a
Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > Is the block disabled by default?
>
> no not yet ...would you prefer this
> also for the dev version or only for
> the release?
I personally would prefer to disable it already for
the dev version as many users are trying out Cocoon
from the CVS and then only use later o
Reinhard Pötz dijo:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
>>> ok... more than 24h...
>>> here are the results.
>>>
>>> Leave it where it is:
>>> Bertrand
>>> Gianugo
>>> Ugo
>>> Torsten
>>> Marc
>>> Sylvain
>>> Michael
>>> Chris
>>> Tim
>>> Vadim
>>>
>>> Move it into scratchpad:
>>> Carsten
>>> Rein
Torsten Curdt wrote:
ok... more than 24h...
here are the results.
Leave it where it is:
Bertrand
Gianugo
Ugo
Torsten
Marc
Sylvain
Michael
Chris
Tim
Vadim
Move it into scratchpad:
Carsten
Reinhard
Antonio
Rename it to jflow:
Joerg
Everything correct?
Any other votes?
Noone answers,
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Noone answers, the vote result is
pretty much clear ...so I asume it's
ok to leave it where it is.
Is that (more or less) ok for everyone?
Carsten, Reinhard, Antonio, Joerg?
Sure, that was the deal :(
Is the block disabled by default?
no not yet ...wo
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> Noone answers, the vote result is
> pretty much clear ...so I asume it's
> ok to leave it where it is.
>
> Is that (more or less) ok for everyone?
> Carsten, Reinhard, Antonio, Joerg?
>
Sure, that was the deal :(
Is the block disabled by default?
Carsten
ok... more than 24h...
here are the results.
Leave it where it is:
Bertrand
Gianugo
Ugo
Torsten
Marc
Sylvain
Michael
Chris
Tim
Vadim
Move it into scratchpad:
Carsten
Reinhard
Antonio
Rename it to jflow:
Joerg
Everything correct?
Any other votes?
Noone answers, the vote result is
prett
18 matches
Mail list logo
