Ups, yes I thought it wasn't used and interestingly it did compile
for me (even build clean did work). Now, I tested it again, and
it doesn't compile anymore - which is obviously the correct thing.
Strange!
I don't know anything about JStyleFormatter. I will have a look
and eventually readd
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [cocoon 2.2] JStyle
Ups, yes I thought it wasn't used and interestingly it did
compile for me (even build clean did work). Now, I tested it
again, and it doesn't compile anymore - which is obviously
On 09.03.2004 09:17, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ok, actually the JStyleFormatter is not used, here is the part
from the xconf:
!-- Specifies which formatter to use to format source code.
This parameter is optional.
It is commented out because of bug #5689: Java
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ok, actually the JStyleFormatter is not used, here is the part
from the xconf:
!-- Specifies which formatter to use to format source code.
This parameter is optional.
It is commented out because of bug #5689: Java code-formatter
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ups, yes I thought it wasn't used and interestingly it did compile
for me (even build clean did work). Now, I tested it again, and
it doesn't compile anymore - which is obviously the correct thing.
Strange!
I don't know anything about JStyleFormatter. I will have a look
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
We should move XSP in a block anyway.
+1
--
Reinhard
