RE: CastorTransformer and CastorSourceConverter

2003-07-18 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Stephan Michels wrote: Same from me, can we move the CastorSourceConverter into the main tree, and also the CastorTransformer? They are very useful in my current application. No, please not into the main trunk, it's already overcrowded with things that don't belong to the core. Now making

RE: CastorTransformer and CastorSourceConverter

2003-07-18 Thread Stephan Michels
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Stephan Michels wrote: Same from me, can we move the CastorSourceConverter into the main tree, and also the CastorTransformer? They are very useful in my current application. No, please not into the main trunk, it's already overcrowded

RE: CastorTransformer and CastorSourceConverter

2003-07-18 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Stephan Michels wrote: Okay, then yet-another-block ;-) I can also provide some components for Castor. We should really consider to move the 'blocks' into an own CVS repository. Similar to Avalon? Whatever we decide, we should wait until we have released 2.1; otherwise we would run into

RE: CastorTransformer and CastorSourceConverter

2003-07-16 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Pötz wrote: In the scratchpad we have a CastorTransformer. I'm not sure but I think that it is a rather long time there. Is it in use and stable and is it time to move it in the main trunk or can we remove it. I also found a CastorSourceConverter in the portal framework. What are

RE: CastorTransformer and CastorSourceConverter

2003-07-16 Thread Reinhard Pötz
From: Carsten Ziegeler Reinhard Pötz wrote: In the scratchpad we have a CastorTransformer. I'm not sure but I think that it is a rather long time there. Is it in use and stable and is it time to move it in the main trunk or can we remove it. I also found a CastorSourceConverter