RE: One XML file for build.xml?

2003-07-18 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Berin Loritsch wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Hi, some months ago the build.xml was split into different files. Although this should create more maintainability and overview, it's actually imho worse. You have to open different files at the same time, as for example properties

RE: One XML file for build.xml?

2003-07-18 Thread Stephan Michels
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Stephan Michels wrote: I strongly against. One big build file is a mess, and unmaintainable. I really don't get your point why one big build is the better choice? It's plain simple: the included files are not editable with an xml editor or

Re: One XML file for build.xml?

2003-07-18 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Carsten Ziegeler wrote, On 18/07/2003 16.03: ... Currently, they are included by xml entities :( If there is an import in ant, this could solve the problem as well, yes. Didn't know that it exists. Come on, Carsten, I wrote about it several times! :-PPP Actually, I wrote the first implementation

RE: One XML file for build.xml?

2003-07-18 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Carsten Ziegeler wrote, On 18/07/2003 16.03: ... Currently, they are included by xml entities :( If there is an import in ant, this could solve the problem as well, yes. Didn't know that it exists. Come on, Carsten, I wrote about it several times! :-PPP You

Re: One XML file for build.xml?

2003-07-18 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
- use as now - monolithic - separated but with Ant nightly I can't vote but I am in favour of the last alternative. Andreas