Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering if some of you guys had experience with Saxon...
>
> Since I like its object model better than Xalan's, and I'm working on
> a couple of projects requiring direct access to an XPath
> implementation, I just wanted to doublecheck that I'
age -
From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 07:30
Subject: Re: [OT] How's "Saxon" like?
On 22 Dec 2003, at 15:25, Nicolas Toper wrote:
> Le Lundi 22 Décembre 2003 16:19, Carsten Ziegeler a écri
On 22 Dec 2003, at 15:25, Nicolas Toper wrote:
Le Lundi 22 Décembre 2003 16:19, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I was wondering if some of you guys had experience with Saxon...
Since I like its object model better than Xalan's, and I'm working
on a
couple of projects requiring di
I agree it is faster and it handles other "cool things" as cool extension.
Besides, even it is not yet a recommandation it implements XSLT 2.0 spec.
Le Lundi 22 Décembre 2003 16:19, Carsten Ziegeler a écrit :
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > I was wondering if some of you guys had experience with Saxon
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> I was wondering if some of you guys had experience with Saxon...
>
> Since I like its object model better than Xalan's, and I'm working on a
> couple of projects requiring direct access to an XPath implementation,
> I just wanted to doublecheck that I'm not going down
