Antonio Gallardo wrote:
dave- wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Mark Lowe wrote:
Nice charts.. They assume that the same folk that are there at the
start of the start line are the same folk that are end or even perhaps
middle. Despite having a lot of respect for stefano's achievements and
th
dave- wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Mark Lowe wrote:
Nice charts.. They assume that the same folk that are there at the
start of the start line are the same folk that are end or even perhaps
middle. Despite having a lot of respect for stefano's achievements and
the contribution that cocoon
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Mark Lowe wrote:
Nice charts.. They assume that the same folk that are there at the
start of the start line are the same folk that are end or even perhaps
middle. Despite having a lot of respect for stefano's achievements and
the contribution that cocoon has made, I th
Mark Lowe wrote:
Nice charts.. They assume that the same folk that are there at the
start of the start line are the same folk that are end or even perhaps
middle. Despite having a lot of respect for stefano's achievements and
the contribution that cocoon has made, I think the graphs are wrong,
o
I've been wanting to add my 2 pence since stefano's "is cocoon
redundant" thread. I also admit i'm not a cocoon developer.
Nice charts.. They assume that the same folk that are there at the
start of the start line are the same folk that are end or even perhaps
middle. Despite having a lot of respe
On Saturday 10 December 2005 19:20, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > The orthogonality of Cocoon has "died". Noone talks about views. Noone
> > highlights the ability to serve same content to many user agents. Noone
> > is interested in truly useful smaller components. Noone ca
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
What can we do?
Two things:
1) breath and relax, we are not going to get run over: changing the
slope does *NOT* change the nature of the function (they will
understand that as soon as they cross that equi-cost point... and
complexity grows even faster the more "
On 08.12.2005, at 19:21, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:Cocoon is what it is today, but what it is tomorrow is defined by what we, collectively, decide.Amen :)...I also started a long-winded response to this big thread(s) butsince at least a little crowd is going to meet soon at the ApacheConI ended up th
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 09 December 2005 02:21, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
And in terms of moving the "equi-cost" point to the left, there are two
fundmentally different variables to consider.
for instance, if t
y = a * b / x `
\/
total cost of owners
On Friday 09 December 2005 02:21, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
And in terms of moving the "equi-cost" point to the left, there are two
fundmentally different variables to consider.
for instance, if t
y = a * b / x `
\/
total cost of ownership (y)
^
|
10 matches
Mail list logo
