Alfred Nathaniel pisze:
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 14:32 -0400, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Can somebody please try out to add this dependency explicitly or exclude
it if we don't need it.
I added the transtive dependencies to the two POMs which needed them.
Now the build runs through and also the sampl
On 17.07.2007 16:16, Alfred Nathaniel wrote:
Can somebody please try out to add this dependency explicitly or exclude
it if we don't need it.
I added the transtive dependencies to the two POMs which needed them.
Now the build runs through and also the samples work again.
Thanks very much, Al
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 14:32 -0400, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> Can somebody please try out to add this dependency explicitly or exclude
> it if we don't need it.
I added the transtive dependencies to the two POMs which needed them.
Now the build runs through and also the samples work again.
The endo
On 16.07.2007 02:49, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
What's so specific about this spring-dao.jar or it's pom that only for it
this property is retrieved?
How does this dependency come in at all? It's not a direct dependency of
Cocoon. Aren't all direct and transitive dependencies supposed to be
decla
Joerg Heinicke schrieb:
> On 13.07.2007 15:30, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>
>> What's so specific about this spring-dao.jar or it's pom that only for it
>> this property is retrieved?
>
> How does this dependency come in at all? It's not a direct dependency of
> Cocoon. Aren't all direct and transitiv
On 13.07.2007 15:30, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
What's so specific about this spring-dao.jar or it's pom that only for it
this property is retrieved?
How does this dependency come in at all? It's not a direct dependency of
Cocoon. Aren't all direct and transitive dependencies supposed to be
decla
On 13.07.2007 06:23, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Actually in Jan you filed yourself a bugreport
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2782 where ${project.version} was
>> resolved to 2.4.1. (You were then still using JDK1.4.2?)
> Yes, I used 1.4.2
>
>>
>> I guess that is due an endorsed Xalan/Xe
Alfred Nathaniel wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 07:50 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> did you try maven 2.0.7 with jdk 1.4.2?
>>
>> While building Cocoon with 2.0.7 and jdk1.5, I noticed that the version
>> for the spring-dao was resolved to 2.0.4which fortunately is
>> available :(
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 07:50 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did you try maven 2.0.7 with jdk 1.4.2?
>
> While building Cocoon with 2.0.7 and jdk1.5, I noticed that the version
> for the spring-dao was resolved to 2.0.4which fortunately is
> available :(
>
> Carsten
Nope, same probl
Hi,
did you try maven 2.0.7 with jdk 1.4.2?
While building Cocoon with 2.0.7 and jdk1.5, I noticed that the version
for the spring-dao was resolved to 2.0.4which fortunately is
available :(
Carsten
Alfred Nathaniel wrote:
> There seems to be a Maven-intrinsic problem with building trunk usi
10 matches
Mail list logo
