Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Previously we have discussed about three continuations manager work
modes:
- standard (current functionality)
- continuations invalidated along with session, still the continuation
is reachable from other sessions (or no session at all)
- fully
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:49, Leszek Gawron dijo:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
encoding is
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:49, Leszek Gawron dijo:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Previously we have discussed about three continuations manager work modes:
- standard (current functionality)
- continuations invalidated along with session, still the continuation
is reachable from other sessions (or no session at all)
- fully isolated. only the session that
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Previously we have discussed about three continuations manager work
modes:
- standard (current functionality)
- continuations invalidated along with session, still the continuation
is reachable from other sessions (or no session at
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 01:03, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...
+?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
...
This is BOM (byte ordering mark). It is being written by some of xml
editors to the beginning of the multibyte encoded (i.e. utf-8) xml
file. The file I commited is a valid xml.
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:21, Leszek Gawron dijo:
By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools detect utf
encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI encoding is assumed.
then switch to Linux! ;-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
encoding is assumed...
AFAIU this is ok for 16-bit based encodings, not for UTF-8.
-Bertrand
smime.p7s
Description:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
encoding is assumed...
AFAIU this is ok for 16-bit based encodings, not for UTF-8.
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:49, Leszek Gawron dijo:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
encoding is assumed...
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:49, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
... Because Microsoft did it, and there is so much Notepad data out
there, the UTF-8 BOM became a de facto standard and then a de jure
standard. (Although the BOM is optional.)..
hmm...not sure if notepad is the kind of reference that we want to use
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:49, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
... Because Microsoft did it, and there is so much Notepad data out
there, the UTF-8 BOM became a de facto standard and then a de jure
standard. (Although the BOM is optional.)..
hmm...not sure if notepad is the kind of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: lgawron
Date: Wed Dec 8 03:47:12 2004
New Revision: 111262
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=111262
Log:
implement 2 modes of work for continuations manager:
- standard, as it was up till now
- secure in which continuations are bound to session. Only
Leszek Gawron wrote:
about 2nd: YAGNI (thanks Stefano for new cool phrase :))
I guess it was Sylvain that introduced me to it, so thank him :-)
--
Stefano.
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?YouArentGonnaNeedIt
-Original Message-
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: svn commit: r111262 - in
cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src:
java/org/apache/cocoon/components
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Mie, 8 de Diciembre de 2004, 5:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
Author: lgawron
Date: Wed Dec 8 03:47:12 2004
New Revision: 111262
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=111262
...
cocoon/branches/BRANCH_2_1_X/src/webapp/WEB-INF/cocoon.xconf
---
Le 9 déc. 04, à 01:03, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...
+?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
...
This is BOM (byte ordering mark). It is being written by some of xml
editors to the beginning of the multibyte encoded (i.e. utf-8) xml
file. The file I commited is a valid xml. Check in any xml
17 matches
Mail list logo
