On 15 Dec 2003, at 02:57, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
From the answers so far, I get the perception that the overall feeling
is to wait until the end of the year and perhaps then use the old
treeprocessor if the new one is not finished by then.
Is this right?
If you read the development phases I outli
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
From the answers so far, I get the perception that the overall feeling is to wait until the end of the year and perhaps then use the old treeprocessor if the new one is not finished by then.
Is this right?
That's what I understood too.
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>
> From the answers so far, I get the perception that the
> overall feeling is to wait until the end of the year and
> perhaps then use the old treeprocessor if the new one is not
> finished by then.
>
> Is this right?
>
+1
Unico
From: Carsten Ziegeler
> From the answers so far, I get the perception that the
> overall feeling is to wait until the end of the year and
> perhaps then use the old treeprocessor if the new one is not
> finished by then.
>
> Is this right?
+1
--
Reinhard
>From the answers so far, I get the perception that the overall feeling
is to wait until the end of the year and perhaps then use the old
treeprocessor if the new one is not finished by then.
Is this right?
Carsten
Unico Hommes wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
As the tree processor is the central component that is
required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see
that w
Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>
> On 14.12.2003 14:38, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
> >>>
> >>>As the tree processor is the central component that is required to
> >>>run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
> >>>2.2
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
> >
> >
>
> Stalled... I don't have much time for it now...
>
> >As the tree processor is the central component that is
> required to run cocoon and as we curren
On 14.12.2003 14:38, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
As the tree processor is the central component that is
required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see
that we get
From: Unico Hommes
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
> >
> > As the tree processor is the central component that is
> > required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
> > 2.2 to test/implement anything else
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
Stalled... I don't have much time for it now...
As the tree processor is the central component that is required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start 2.2 to test/implement anything else, I t
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
>
> As the tree processor is the central component that is
> required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
> 2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see
> that we
Hi,
whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
As the tree processor is the central component that is required
to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start 2.2
to test/implement anything else, I think we should see that
we get a runnable 2.2 asap.
What do you think abou
13 matches
Mail list logo
