So, if we want to revive it, do we start working on it within the
dormant folder or should we move it back into sandbox or proper (I
think it was in proper at one time)?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Dave Meikle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would as well.
Regards,
Dave
On 01/04/2008,
I would as well.
Regards,
Dave
On 01/04/2008, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would.
-Matt
--- James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generics may help breathe some new life into
commons-functor. Would
anyone else be interested in helping me revive it?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:52 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if we want to revive it, do we start working on it within the
dormant folder or should we move it back into sandbox or proper (I
think it was in proper at one time)?
It was in the Sandbox when it moved to dormant:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:52 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if we want to revive it, do we start working on it within the
dormant folder or should we move it back into sandbox or proper (I
think
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Benson schrieb:
--- James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So, if we want to revive it, do we start working
on
it within the
dormant folder or should we move it back into
sandbox or proper (I
think it was in proper at one
Matt Benson schrieb:
--- James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if we want to revive it, do we start working on
it within the
dormant folder or should we move it back into
sandbox or proper (I
think it was in proper at one time)?
Was it? I'd thought it hadn't gotten past the
--- James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if we want to revive it, do we start working on
it within the
dormant folder or should we move it back into
sandbox or proper (I
think it was in proper at one time)?
Was it? I'd thought it hadn't gotten past the
sandbox... Actually, it might
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behind again! If Rahul[1] will concede we've
outstripped the need for a vote, I'm fine...
http://commons.markmail.org/message/2tx3y52r6t474okj
Well, I was going to just move it, since it was only in the sandbox.
But, I
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:02 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behind again! If Rahul[1] will concede we've
outstripped the need for a vote, I'm fine...
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't think we needed a vote to add a new sandbox component - at
least not for existing commons committers. I would just go ahead and
do it - which is what I did for the commons-build-plugin
Ok, I've copied it. I
Glad to see you guys getting off the ground. I also did a bit more looking
around for existing projects with compatible licenses and came across Evolvica
http://evolvica.org/ . I approached Andreas Rummier, its sole author, about
contributing to Commons-Math and got the following encouraging
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=72182projectId=172
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Tue 1 Apr 2008 09:07:59 -0700
Finished at: Tue 1 Apr 2008 09:08:18 -0700
Total time: 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number:
On 01/04/2008, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:13 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't think we needed a vote to add a new sandbox component - at
least
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's almost like we need a two-phase commit here. We do some stuff
and then ask everyone are you okay with that? What if we staged our
releases to an SVN working copy? Then, everyone could look at it and
if
Guys, I don't care what happens where--we can use
trunk for generics work, but I would like the option
of finishing a non-generic version of the lib (branch
is fine by me) so we can evaluate the difficulty of
swapping it out for the similar parts of a (also
non-generic) Collections 4.0.
-Matt
On 4/1/08, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jcarman
Date: Tue Apr 1 08:09:51 2008
New Revision: 643434
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=643434view=rev
Log:
Reviving functor
Added:
commons/sandbox/functor/
- copied from r643433,
As my CS graduation I wrote a GA framework to help me solve the problem
I was proposing. It is implemented, may need some improvements with a
less naive and optimized code, but it works fine. I wrote less
interfaces but I really liked Brent's initial interface set and seems to
me the idea will
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/08, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jcarman
Date: Tue Apr 1 08:09:51 2008
New Revision: 643434
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=643434view=rev
Log:
Reviving functor
On 4/1/08, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just added my ugly mug to the crowdvine site
http://apacheconeu2008.crowdvine.com/
snip/
OK, I'll try to find you on 4/9. Mines in transit, should show up on
the speaker page at some point.
-Rahul
Niall
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at
On 4/1/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/08, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jcarman
Date: Tue Apr 1 08:09:51 2008
New Revision: 643434
URL:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/08, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jcarman
Date: Tue Apr 1
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:29 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generics may help breathe some new life into commons-functor. Would
anyone else be interested in helping me revive it?
I've fixed the source
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:23 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:29 AM, James Carman [EMAIL
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:27 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/08, Rahul
On 4/1/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
svn move is equivalent to an svn copy followed by svn delete. So,
I'll just delete the one out of dormant.
snap/
Yup.
I usually use TortoiseSVN
for my SVN stuff (or Intellij IDEA). Tortoise doesn't show a move
command in its menus
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In TortoiseSVN, if you have the source and destination folders open
and right click and drag the file(s)/folder(s) you want to move or
copy to the target folder it pops up a context menu with several
move/copy
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:46 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good questions! I suppose that's the thing to do,
with the understanding that my pushing this makes me
liable if I don't get off my ass and do
--- James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good questions! I suppose that's the thing to
do,
with the understanding that my pushing this makes
me
liable if I don't get off my ass and do what's
needed
to get
28 matches
Mail list logo
