--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Good questions! I suppose that's the thing to
> do,
> > with the understanding that my pushing this makes
> me
> > liable if I don't get off my ass and do what's
> needed
> > to get that branch releasable, huh?
> >
>
> So, how will this work if we want to promote this
> thing to the proper?
To be honest, I'm not sure why [functor] was never
ready to graduate, but I intend to get a better idea
of its true status during the next week or so...
> Do we promote based on the 1.0 code?
If for some reason the generics branch is ready before
the 1.0, perhaps we can cross that bridge when we come
to it?
> We can't do a
> release out of
> the sandbox, correct?
Correct.
> Or, does it even matter that
> we'll have two
> active branches (trunk and the non-genericized 1.0
> branch) before
> promotion?
I don't see that it really matters. :)
> This is somewhat of a weird situation.
>
Agreed. :) I specialize in those.
-Matt
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total
Access, No Cost.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
