On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> +1 to your suggestion, with the addition of adding ASL 1.1 to the
>> LICENSE file if it's ASL 1.1 rather than AL 2.0.
>
> The license file says ASL 1.1:
> http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jrpm/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=2&view=mar
Hi,
i made a patch of a first idea of the ChangeSet design which has been
proposed by Torsten.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-183
The testcase fails with the ArOutputStream. Problem here is located in
the Ar-Implementation. Torsten,
would be quite cool if you can check this out, I
hi,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-274
I added a new little patch in Jira, cause the ArInputStream has a
small bug which causes problems with deleting from the archive.
Just 2 or 3 lines, which enables ArInputStream to make use of its
offset variable
Cheers
---
On 2009-01-08, Antonio wrote:
> Well... who is to say that we all didn't steal the code from our
> employers and commit it?
Everyone of us claimed it when we signed the CLA before getting commit
access (well, people as old as me may have committed stuff before
signing the CLA, but it applied to
> +1 to your suggestion, with the addition of adding ASL 1.1 to the
> LICENSE file if it's ASL 1.1 rather than AL 2.0.
The license file says ASL 1.1:
http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jrpm/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=2&view=markup
Some files are explicit AL 2.0:
http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.ne
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Antonio wrote:
> 2009/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
>> I have spoken to the developers and they are willing to sign the
>> software grant and donate the code to the compress component if they
>> are mentionend in the code (guess NOTICE file would be ok too).
>
> No wait
This is a dead end - we don't ask JUnit to sign anything, we don't ask
Linux kernel hackers just to be users. Using under license and
redistributing is something we do all over the place and just because
this is our license (but not our code) doesn't change anything.
Hen
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:
I'm piled deep with work etc, both dayjob and Apache [Taglibs, Attic,
JIRA admin, Legal]; but DbUtils is one of the Commons components I pay
attention to and I'm prepared to apply patches.
There's not much in JIRA yet patch wise - nothing that isn't arguable
or a big piece of functionality (Stored
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Goeschl [mailto:siegfried.goes...@it20one.at]
> Sent: 08 January 2009 21:41
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I went through the installation process and it works - the only prob
Hi Mark,
I went through the installation process and it works - the only problem
I had was that I need to be "su" to successfully start the application
(don't know if this is a problem after all).
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
>>>
java version "1.5.0_16"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Ed
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Liam Coughlin wrote:
> Thanks Rahul --
>
> Second follow up question -- how do we go about gaining access to the
> project if no one steps up?
>
TBH, its tough if no one steps up even to look at patches. I'd attach
a small patch or two to test the waters, and go f
works fine @home, but not @workMaybe some $%! firewall...
2009/1/8 Rahul Akolkar
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:03 AM, nicolas de loof
> wrote:
> > I just noticed the ci profile defines the exepected snapshot repository
> > without the Release Candidate stuff.
> >
> > Is there something wrong with
Thanks Rahul --
Second follow up question -- how do we go about gaining access to the
project if no one steps up?
Cheers,
-Liam
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> Ideally, anyone interested in helping should be on this list, so
> posting here as you did is indeed a good wa
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:31 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> So presumably the following commented lines can be removed?
>
> //boolean next = !SCXMLHelper.isStringEmpty(t.getNext());
> //if (next) {
> //b.append(" target=\"" + t.getNext() + "\"");
> //}
>b.append(">
On 08/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> > Looks like the main remaining item with the J6 branch is the removal
> > of deprecated code.
> >
>
>
>
> WRT the cleanup you mean?
Yes.
> Perhaps. In general, that is by far not the
> main remaining ite
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:03 AM, nicolas de loof
wrote:
> I just noticed the ci profile defines the exepected snapshot repository
> without the Release Candidate stuff.
>
> Is there something wrong with people.apache.org ? I simply can't connect
> (time out) either with maven deploy nor WinSCP.
>
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Liam Coughlin wrote:
> Hello Julien
>
> Branching for java 5 development would be an excellent idea as fulling using
> some of the java5 feature set results in some non-trivial changes to some of
> the project's structures.
>
> So the follow up question is -- is th
I'm not saying they need to prove it, but if we have a code grant on
hand (which states that they have the rights to license/donate the
code I would assume), then we have a bit more of a paper trail. But,
if you insist that it's not necessary, I trust you. You seem to have
a better grasp on this
> -Original Message-
>
> No, not everyone has the right to license their code with the Apache
> License.
Wrong. Anyone can license *their* code any way they wish.
If they work for a company and their contract states that
> the company owns anything they create under their employ, then th
> -Original Message-
> From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com]
> Sent: 08 January 2009 15:42
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [compress] Including AL Code from other projects
>
> I am by no means an expert on licenses and stuff, but it would seem to
> me that if
2009/1/8 James Carman :
> No, not everyone has the right to license their code with the Apache
> License. If they work for a company and their contract states that
> the company owns anything they create under their employ, then they do
> not own it.
You're right... it's so sad...
> Also, who i
2009/1/8 Antonio :
> 2009/1/8 James Carman :
>> I am by no means an expert on licenses and stuff, but it would seem to
>> me that if the authors are willing to sign a code grant, then why not
>> let them do it?
>
> Because they want to be mentioned! With the software grant they
> transfer the right
No, not everyone has the right to license their code with the Apache
License. If they work for a company and their contract states that
the company owns anything they create under their employ, then they do
not own it. Also, who is to say that they didn't steal the code from
some codebase (perhap
2009/1/8 James Carman :
> I am by no means an expert on licenses and stuff, but it would seem to
> me that if the authors are willing to sign a code grant, then why not
> let them do it?
Because they want to be mentioned! With the software grant they
transfer the rights to the foundation, they won
2009/1/8 Mark Thomas :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com]
>> Sent: 08 January 2009 15:16
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [compress] Including ASL Code from other projects
>>
>> My only point is that we don't know for sure that thes
Hello Julien
Branching for java 5 development would be an excellent idea as fulling using
some of the java5 feature set results in some non-trivial changes to some of
the project's structures.
So the follow up question is -- is there a commons committer who's willing
to help us out, and how do we
I am by no means an expert on licenses and stuff, but it would seem to
me that if the authors are willing to sign a code grant, then why not
let them do it?
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com]
> -Original Message-
> From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com]
> Sent: 08 January 2009 15:16
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [compress] Including ASL Code from other projects
>
> My only point is that we don't know for sure that these folks are
> *allowed* to li
My only point is that we don't know for sure that these folks are
*allowed* to license their code under the ASL. All we have is a
Javadoc header and an ASL license declaration in their pom file. I
understand that the ASL is very permissive.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Antonio wrote:
> 2009
No, I think you still need the software grant.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>> The software grant *donates* the code to the foundation, so all the
>> rights become of Apache itself, not of the owners.
>> The previous owners of the right will be mentioned only in the
2009/1/8 James Carman :
> No, I think you still need the software grant.
Wrong, ASL is a very permissive license, so you can do almost anything
you want with the code.
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.ap
2009/1/8 Antonio :
> 2009/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
>>> The software grant *donates* the code to the foundation, so all the
>>> rights become of Apache itself, not of the owners.
>>> The previous owners of the right will be mentioned only in the IP
>>> (intellectual property) clearance form.
>>> In
2009/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
>> The software grant *donates* the code to the foundation, so all the
>> rights become of Apache itself, not of the owners.
>> The previous owners of the right will be mentioned only in the IP
>> (intellectual property) clearance form.
>> In your case I suggest to:
>
Hello Liam, hello DbUtils people,
I'd like to contribute in this too, as well as seing some patches being
analyzed/commited;
there is a bunch of submitted patched waiting for being reviewed.
I think that the main issue for dbutils is that there has been little
activity on this project
for the l
> The software grant *donates* the code to the foundation, so all the
> rights become of Apache itself, not of the owners.
> The previous owners of the right will be mentioned only in the IP
> (intellectual property) clearance form.
> In your case I suggest to:
> 1. add the code in your software;
>
Wow ...looking forward to have a look :)
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 13:36, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Maybe we should really leave out the ChangeSet support for a 1.0 and
>> add that later.
>
> I have a basic ChangeSet support nearly finished :-) I can propably
> send a Delete- and a Add-Operation
> Maybe we should really leave out the ChangeSet support for a 1.0 and
> add that later.
I have a basic ChangeSet support nearly finished :-) I can propably
send a Delete- and a Add-Operation tomorrow morning. Maybe you'll have
some refactoring issues, but since this just a few lines of code, this
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jetty has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-http has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-define has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jface has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-ojb has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-bean has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-soap has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-validate has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-swt has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
integ
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-ant has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-antlr has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-betwixt has an issue affecting its community
integrati
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-log has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-velocity has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-sql has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-threads has an issue affecting its community
integrati
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-regexp has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-memory has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-interaction has an issue affecting its community
integ
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-email has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-dynabean has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jms has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit has an issue affecting its community
integrati
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-bsf has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-avalon has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-beanshell has an issue affecting its community
integra
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-util has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-junit has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Applied! Thanks!
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-195
>
> describes a problem, which occurs in the Ant-BZIP2-Classes and in in
> our implementation (which is an old version of the ant stuff).
> I created a patch which updates our codebase to the current codebase
> of ant which shoul
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Applied! Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 09:10, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please apply the patch provided here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-273
>
> It updates old and evil stenching TAR compress code with fresh, soft
> coated ant code.
> This is a must have, cause th
2009/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
> I have spoken to the developers and they are willing to sign the
> software grant and donate the code to the compress component if they
> are mentionend in the code (guess NOTICE file would be ok too).
No wait!
The software grant *donates* the code to the foundatio
Great! Yes, that's the one to fax. I guess we only have one fax number
so that should be the one:
http://apache.org/foundation/contact.html
NOTICE file would be a good place. I've also come across a CREDITS
file from time to time.
cheers
--
Torsten
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 06:33, Christian Grobme
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue af
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-services has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-messenger has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Hi,
please apply the patch provided here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-273
It updates old and evil stenching TAR compress code with fresh, soft
coated ant code.
This is a must have, cause the newer implementations are fixing many bugs which
make it impossible to use compress, if
I just noticed the ci profile defines the exepected snapshot repository
without the Release Candidate stuff.
Is there something wrong with people.apache.org ? I simply can't connect
(time out) either with maven deploy nor WinSCP.
Nicolas
2009/1/7 Rahul Akolkar
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM
90 matches
Mail list logo
