[dbutils] sandbox "java5" branch and "bugfixing" branch created

2009-02-07 Thread Dan Fabulich
Henri Yandell wrote: Let's create a branch in the sandbox and let Dan dive in. Effectively it's the git model, but slightly closer because he's already a committer. Once it's reached its release point, we can all be looking and debating whether it is DbUtils 2.0 or DbUtils2. [The first is a new

Re: [compress] SANDBOX-246 remaining Findbugs issues

2009-02-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-02-05, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >>> * ZipOutputStream contains some proteted static final byte[] >>> "constants" > >>> This means any subclass could modify them. Findbugs suggests to >>> make the package private. Ant couldn'

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons IO -

2009-02-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:36 PM, contin...@vmbuild.apache.org > wrote: >> Online report : >> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=141109&projectId=155 > > That page is read-protected even after I registered an

Re: [math] RealMatrixImpl, DenseRealMatrix and MatrixUtils factory methods

2009-02-07 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : I noticed a breakage in one of my apps that uses MatrixUtils#createRealMatrix(double[][], boolean). This method seems to have been removed. I guess this is because DenseRealMatrix can't support this. I understand the value of DenseRealMatrix, but

Re: [math] RealMatrixImpl, DenseRealMatrix and MatrixUtils factory methods

2009-02-07 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : > I noticed a breakage in one of my apps that uses > MatrixUtils#createRealMatrix(double[][], boolean). This method seems to > have been removed. I guess this is because DenseRealMatrix can't > support this. I understand the value of DenseRealMatrix, but I still > see value

Re: [configuration][maven] Deploying release to maven repository

2009-02-07 Thread Ralph Goers
Actually, the maven folks (of which I am one) are creating a new Nexus repo at https://repository.zones.apache.org. I would suggest we focus on using that in the future. Ralph On Feb 7, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: Accordin

Re: [configuration][maven] Deploying release to maven repository

2009-02-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > According to a post on the user list the latest release of [configuration] > (1.6) did not make it into the maven 2 repository. > > When doing the release I copied the jars and the pom into the Java > repository at [1] as described in section 8

Re: Request sandbox access

2009-02-07 Thread Henri Yandell
Let's create a branch in the sandbox and let Dan dive in. Effectively it's the git model, but slightly closer because he's already a committer. Once it's reached its release point, we can all be looking and debating whether it is DbUtils 2.0 or DbUtils2. [The first is a new release of the existing

[math] RealMatrixImpl, DenseRealMatrix and MatrixUtils factory methods

2009-02-07 Thread Phil Steitz
I noticed a breakage in one of my apps that uses MatrixUtils#createRealMatrix(double[][], boolean). This method seems to have been removed. I guess this is because DenseRealMatrix can't support this. I understand the value of DenseRealMatrix, but I still see value in the double[][]-backed Re

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC1)

2009-02-07 Thread Oliver Heger
Some smaller nits: - As sebb already mentioned, the copyright in NOTICE should be updated to 2009. - There are about 70 checkstyle errors, most of them seem to be easy to fix. But this is nothing blocking, so +1. Oliver Henri Yandell schrieb: Pushing out a first RC for CLI-1.x. It's a bit of

Re: Request sandbox access

2009-02-07 Thread Torsten Curdt
So how do we want to handle this? Happy to give you sandbox access. That said it should probably better be a branch on the DbUtils project. And as a side note: I doubt folks here will sign off on a release that changes the java target version in a minor version change ;) cheers -- Torsten On Sa

[compress] Let Archive*Stream and Compressor*Stream extend Filter*Stream

2009-02-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, I change ArchiveOutputStream extend FilterOutputStream while I modified ZipArchiveOutputStream and it seems a very natural thing to do for all the other streams as well. All concrete compressor/archiver streams have constructors that take a different stream as their argument and most of them

[compress] Some merging in zip package

2009-02-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, I've merged ZipEntry into ZipArchiveEntry and ZipOutputStream into ZipArchiveOutputStream. As a side effect ZipArchiveOutputStream now supports encoding of file names and the zip file comment (among other things that it does better than java.util.zip.ZipOutputStream like providing usable Unix

Re: [dbutils] karma Re: Request sandbox access

2009-02-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-07, Dan Fabulich wrote: > Assuming I don't yet have karma to write to the sandbox, may I > politely ask someone to grant it to me? Should be done now. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons IO -

2009-02-07 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:36 PM, contin...@vmbuild.apache.org >> FilesystemObserverTestCase >> testFileCreate : >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: E[0 0 0 1 0 0]: No. of directories >> chan

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons IO -

2009-02-07 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=141186&projectId=155 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 7 Feb 2009 01:18:48 -0800 Finished at: Sat 7 Feb 2009 01:20:58 -0800 Total time: 2m 9s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numbe

Re: [IO] svn commit: r741531

2009-02-07 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > eol-style wasn't set for the additions in this rev Thanks for catching this! I added the missing eol-style settings in revision 741859. > (but in a later rev, r741562, the prop came through with the adds). Looks like my new Eclipse ins