Re: proposal for performance/usability optimisations in commons.lang.Validate

2009-05-07 Thread Henri Yandell
trunk/ is now JDK 5 focused. It'll be Lang 3.0, but is very unlikely to keep the same package naming. My biggest concern with ellipsis code is that null moves from being null to being null inside an Object[]. So we could see some unnecessary API changing if we're not careful. Otherwise - the

Re: proposal for performance/usability optimisations in commons.lang.Validate

2009-05-07 Thread Mark Struberg
Thanks a lot Henri! I talked with Shawn Pearce about possible performance issues and we now ended up with 3 function groups: notNull(Object) notNull(Object, String) notNull(Object, String, Object...); So the JVM doesn't need to create an Object[] if we only like to provide a single String

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-05-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-05-07 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit has an issue affecting its community