[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Lang -

2009-06-29 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=197004&projectId=114 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Mon 29 Jun 2009 23:35:21 -0700 Finished at: Mon 29 Jun 2009 23:36:32 -0700 Total time: 1m 10s Build Trigger: Schedule Bu

[all] Release process (was: svn commit: r788761)

2009-06-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Changed the email subject, it seemed more appropriate IMO even though historically its not our favorite topic. Multiple replies below ... On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > I think this things were discussed a couple of times before and my > understandin

[Commons-JCI]

2009-06-29 Thread Liam Coughlin
Is this project still active? there's a 1.1 release sort of sitting dormant since ~2007...

Re: svn commit: r788761 - /commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_2/

2009-06-29 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, some thoughts along the line ... +) I would like to use the M2 release plugin +) I don't mind copying the release tag to a "RCX SVN" tag if the vote fails +) the is work-around to distinguish multiple RCs +) I know that the release process is not perfect but "perfect is the enemy of go

Re: svn commit: r788761 - /commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_2/

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Struberg
I assume 'cutting a release' as doing a mvn release:stage or something similar. The release artifacts will only be pushed to the public repos and download areas etc. after the vote has finally passed. The way this works basically moves all the effort to the last RC-n voting step. It is utterly

Re: svn commit: r788761 - /commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_2/

2009-06-29 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
What do you mean by "cutting a release"? If this means building the distribution files, then your points 3.) and 4.) are a contradiction. Jochen On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > I personally don't get all the discussion here, because this very question > has imho been

Re: svn commit: r788761 - /commons/proper/email/tags/EMAIL_1_2/

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Struberg
I personally don't get all the discussion here, because this very question has imho been discussed a lot in the past (on commons and maven lists). From what I know the widely agreed output of this discussion has been: 1.) do n PRJ-x-RC-n before cutting a release and vote on them as if they we

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-06-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-06-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue