- Bill Barker billwbar...@verizon.net a écrit :
Currently StatUtils.sum(double []) (as well as most other statistics
that
operate on arrays) returns NaN on a zero length array. As pointed out
in
the Jira issue, this is not the conventional treatment of a summation
over
the empty
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 10/06/2010, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I would count this as a bug fix rather than a compatibility break. (my vote
is non-binding, of course)
I agree that the current behaviour is wrong.
Unfortunately, the current behaviour is documented in the Javadoc, so
it would be a
Bill Barker wrote:
Currently StatUtils.sum(double []) (as well as most other statistics
that operate on arrays) returns NaN on a zero length array. As pointed
out in the Jira issue, this is not the conventional treatment of a
summation over the empty set (which would return zero) in the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
The generated code needs to be better managed with respect to SVN updates.
As an example of a pattern we don't want to see, r953073 [1] deletes a
number of (previously) generated files. Subsequently, r953075 [2] adds
back some of those files after regenerating based on changes to the
model. Such
Should(n't) these methods call toString() before comparing
CharSequence arguments of different RT types since CharSequence makes
no claims regarding equals methods? ObjectUtils.equals() can
call .equals(), but IMHO the principle of least surprise would
dictate that StringUtils ensure that
Hi Rahul,
Deleting files in SVN server last time is due to my lapse operation,
sorry for that :-(
In fact, pattern in (B) is not avaiable, we can not help developers
generate all the necessary code by theirselves because we can only
generate basic source code and we must change source code by
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Xun Long Gui ustbco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rahul,
Deleting files in SVN server last time is due to my lapse operation,
sorry for that :-(
snip/
OK, thanks for clarifying, please be careful not to delete going forward.
In fact, pattern in (B) is not
