On 09/27/2010 06:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 27.09.2010 17:45, sebb wrote:
On 27 September 2010 15:32, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 09/27/2010 04:08 PM, sebb wrote:
I don't have VC 2005, but I was able to build prunmgr and prunsrv with
Visual Studio 2008 just now.
[I realise that these will be link
On 27.09.2010 17:45, sebb wrote:
On 27 September 2010 15:32, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 09/27/2010 04:08 PM, sebb wrote:
I don't have VC 2005, but I was able to build prunmgr and prunsrv with
Visual Studio 2008 just now.
[I realise that these will be linked to a CRTL which is not
backwards-compati
Hi all guys,
first of all thanks everybody mentored me during the path of the 2.1
release, especially Rahul and Sebastian, always ready to provide a
valid help, I appreciate it very much :)
I'd like to discuss with you what I'd like to do in the next future:
* fix the site issues: we have broken
On 27 September 2010 15:32, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 04:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> I don't have VC 2005, but I was able to build prunmgr and prunsrv with
>> Visual Studio 2008 just now.
>> [I realise that these will be linked to a CRTL which is not
>> backwards-compatible, but for local te
On 09/27/2010 04:08 PM, sebb wrote:
I don't have VC 2005, but I was able to build prunmgr and prunsrv with
Visual Studio 2008 just now.
[I realise that these will be linked to a CRTL which is not
backwards-compatible, but for local testing that should be OK]
Sure.
I'm using the Driver Develop
On 27 September 2010 14:42, sebb wrote:
> On 27 September 2010 13:53, sebb wrote:
>> On 27 September 2010 13:49, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> On 09/27/2010 02:16 PM, sebb wrote:
Might be simpler to recheck if CPU is set after handling BUILD_CPU,
rather than nesting further.
i.e.
>>
On 27 September 2010 13:53, sebb wrote:
> On 27 September 2010 13:49, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> On 09/27/2010 02:16 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> Might be simpler to recheck if CPU is set after handling BUILD_CPU,
>>> rather than nesting further.
>>> i.e.
>>>
>>> IF CPU not set
>>> try to set from BUILD_CP
On 27 September 2010 13:49, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 02:16 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> Might be simpler to recheck if CPU is set after handling BUILD_CPU,
>> rather than nesting further.
>> i.e.
>>
>> IF CPU not set
>> try to set from BUILD_CPU
>> ENDIF
>>
>> IF CPU not set
>> try to set from
On 09/27/2010 02:16 PM, sebb wrote:
Might be simpler to recheck if CPU is set after handling BUILD_CPU,
rather than nesting further.
i.e.
IF CPU not set
try to set from BUILD_CPU
ENDIF
IF CPU not set
try to set from PROCESSOR_ARCH*
ENDIF
Feel free to modify it according to what you think is
On 27 September 2010 12:10, wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Mon Sep 27 11:10:57 2010
> New Revision: 1001670
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001670&view=rev
> Log:
> Handle some of the possible variants from the PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE
> environment
Unfortunately the patch does not wor
On 09/27/2010 01:59 PM, sebb wrote:
On 27 September 2010 12:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 09/27/2010 12:33 PM, sebb wrote:
On 27 September 2010 10:48, Mladen Turkwrote:
Hi,
I plan to T&R Daemon 1.0.4 this week
There are couple of minor and one major (DAEMON-100)
fixes resolved in the SVN.
On 27 September 2010 12:12, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 12:33 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 27 September 2010 10:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> I plan to T&R Daemon 1.0.4 this week
>>> There are couple of minor and one major (DAEMON-100)
>>> fixes resolved in the SVN.
>>>
>>>
>>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 09/27/2010 12:33 PM, sebb wrote:
On 27 September 2010 10:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to T&R Daemon 1.0.4 this week
There are couple of minor and one major (DAEMON-100)
fixes resolved in the SVN.
Comments?
It looks like the README instructions for building procrun on Windows
are w
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 27 September 2010 10:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I plan to T&R Daemon 1.0.4 this week
> There are couple of minor and one major (DAEMON-100)
> fixes resolved in the SVN.
>
>
> Comments?
It looks like the README instructions for building procrun on Windows
are wrong, as there are no .x86
Hi,
I plan to T&R Daemon 1.0.4 this week
There are couple of minor and one major (DAEMON-100)
fixes resolved in the SVN.
Comments?
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional co
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
- "Gilles Sadowski" a écrit :
> > [...]
> > >>
> > >> ---CUT---
> > >>double[] a = new double[] {1, 2, 3};
> > >>double[] b = new double[] {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
> > >>Percentile pA = new Percentile(a);
> > >>Percentile pB = new Percentile(b);
> > >>
> > >>double r;
> > >>r
Hi all guys,
sorry I'm late but I took yesterday to rest a little. That's exactly
the point of my question in my first message, so I approached the
problem using the Antonio's suggestion, since that part was missing on
the wiki page or the link Phil pointed. If you explain me what the
procedure is,
21 matches
Mail list logo
