To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=882projectId=80
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 5 Oct 2010 22:20:24 +
Finished at: Tue 5 Oct 2010 22:22:02 +
Total time: 1m 37s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
On 2 October 2010 16:11, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried running my modified copy of the test cases.
The testExecuteWatchdogSync() also hangs on OpenVMS. Not sure where to
put the timeouts for that yet, so I tried disabling it.
I now get the following errors/failures:
Time: 88.365
On 6 October 2010 03:36, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Wed Oct 6 02:36:39 2010
New Revision: 1004882
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004882view=rev
Log:
Make reader and encoding fields immutable
Note: the same changes could be applied to the identically named class
in
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:41 AM, sebb AT ASF s...@apache.org wrote:
On 6 October 2010 03:36, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Wed Oct 6 02:36:39 2010
New Revision: 1004882
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004882view=rev
Log:
Make reader and encoding fields immutable
Note:
On 6 October 2010 03:57, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:41 AM, sebb AT ASF s...@apache.org wrote:
On 6 October 2010 03:36, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sebb
Date: Wed Oct 6 02:36:39 2010
New Revision: 1004882
URL:
On 10/06/2010 07:23 AM, sebb wrote:
On 2 October 2010 16:11, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS.
I don't know if there is a workround.
I know some time ago I had some fixes to the OpenVMS support. Sadly I
had to move on to something
I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC2 for review (rc1 never went past the
tag). As there have been quite a few changes in the last week, I'll
leave it a few days before even considering whether to call a vote, to
give time for feedback.
The distro is here:
