Hi.
Gilles,
This should have been done in three separate commits.
The first one, at least, should have been separated. It is easier
for reviewers and makes the commit log clearer if we separate
formatting / javadoc cleanup commits from those that update or
change the code. The JIRA
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi all,
It seems I forgot to store the final version as a separate tag when
releasing 2.2.
Sorry for the late fix
Luc
Le 20/03/2011 12:54, l...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: luc
Date: Sun Mar 20 11:54:15 2011
New Revision: 1083415
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1083415view=rev
Log:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 20 March 2011 10:12, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hi.
Gilles,
This should have been done in three separate commits.
The first one, at least, should have been separated. It is easier
for reviewers and makes the commit log clearer if we separate
formatting /
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:30:37PM +, sebb wrote:
On 20 March 2011 10:12, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hi.
Gilles,
This should have been done in three separate commits.
The first one, at least, should have been separated. It is easier
for reviewers and
On 3/20/11 10:08 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:30:37PM +, sebb wrote:
On 20 March 2011 10:12, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
Hi.
Gilles,
This should have been done in three separate commits.
The first one, at least, should have been
Phil,
Sorry to be blunt here, but it *is* up to the community to decide
how we manage our source code. We have established practices that
we expect all committers to abide by. These practices include
separating commits. You need to do that. Thanks.
Yes, you are blunt, and patronizing.
Le 20/03/2011 19:28, Phil Steitz a écrit :
Quite a few methods have been added to RandomDataImpl that are not
in RandomData. The methods were added to the impl class only to
preserve backward compatibility in versions 1 and 2. In 3.0, we now
have the choice to add the methods to the
On 3/20/11 12:18 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Phil,
Sorry to be blunt here, but it *is* up to the community to decide
how we manage our source code. We have established practices that
we expect all committers to abide by. These practices include
separating commits. You need to do that.
11 matches
Mail list logo