On 6/10/11 2:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Jun 10, 2011, at 13:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/06/2011 17:47, Phil Steitz wrote:
I guess I "want it both ways" here. We already have a use case for
tracking instances - abandoned connection
This is over my head. For all I know this may apply to all of our
components, since I think the metadata comes from Commons Parent.
Can someone knowledgeable in OSGI please have a look and comment on
the ticket and post back here if there is something we need to
change in Commons Parent?
Thanks!
Hi all guys,
before moving commons-graph on sandbox... does it make sense having
graph2 directory when we *never* released the 1?
IMHO the move should be
svn move https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/graph2
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/graph
Does it make sense also
On 11/06/2011 08:44, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I have looked at this some more and I think we have two choices,
> depending on how much we want to be able to do in terms of
> monitoring and instance management. The simplest solution is to
> enable only holding references to instances checked out to cli
Hi all guys,
after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
spare time to dedicate to oss :D ) to accept Meiyo as a new component
in Sandbox.
I already sent the signed SoftwareGrant to secretary@ and this m
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Please look at java.util.IdentityHashMap again. I think it does
everything you're looking for except concurrent access. Given other
requirements, I'm not sure a ConcurrentHashMap will buy much performance
anyway.
chas
On 6/11/11 5:54 AM, "Mark Thomas" wrote:
>On 11/06/2011 08:44, Phil Steitz
On 11/06/2011 12:26, Honton, Charles wrote:
> Please look at java.util.IdentityHashMap again. I think it does
> everything you're looking for except concurrent access. Given other
> requirements, I'm not sure a ConcurrentHashMap will buy much performance
> anyway.
I suggest you take a look in th
+1 - I don't think I'd call it "meiyo", though.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
> about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
> spare time to dedicate to oss :D
graph is fine
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> before moving commons-graph on sandbox... does it make sense having
> graph2 directory when we *never* released the 1?
> IMHO the move should be
>
> svn move https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/grap
> [X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
> [ ] +/-0
> [ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
Interesting project, but is a vote really necessary?
As far as I know you wrote it alone, so you could simply drop it into
the sandbox? I have asked the same b/c I wrote a JSON lib on
@James: sure, Meiyo ATM is just an alias of this initial codebase, we
still have to find a general consensus if it has to be released as a
proper component or including different parts to different existing
components
@Christian: I thought so, also for other Sandbox proposals I used to
call for a
Thanks James, I'm going to do it NOW!!! :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> graph is fine
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> before moving commons-graph on s
Am 11.06.2011 16:13, schrieb simonetrip...@apache.org:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Sat Jun 11 14:12:59 2011
New Revision: 1134648
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1134648&view=rev
Log:
fixed copyright years
Modified:
commons/sandbox/graph/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/graph/
Hi Oliver!!
thanks a lot for having noticed it, I didn't pay attention on it!!!
THANKS
Have a nice weekend, all the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Am 11.06.2011 16:13, schrieb simonetrip...@a
Le 11/06/2011 13:54, James Carman a écrit :
graph is fine
Fine to me too. In fact in this case graph2 would even be inconvenient,
as people may ask about it.
Luc
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
Hi all guys,
before moving commons-graph on sandbox... does it make s
Le 11/06/2011 14:08, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
@James: sure, Meiyo ATM is just an alias of this initial codebase, we
still have to find a general consensus if it has to be released as a
proper component or including different parts to different existing
components
@Christian: I thought so, also f
Hi,
I have looked into the old OgnlParser sources. My intention was to
detect the changes that have been made manually. If that would be
possible, I'd basically reapply those changes to ognl.jjt, or ognl.jj
and then would switch to a dynamically generated parser.
Unfortunately, it is almost impos
On Jun 11, 2011, at 11:49, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have looked into the old OgnlParser sources. My intention was to
> detect the changes that have been made manually. If that would be
> possible, I'd basically reapply those changes to ognl.jjt, or ognl.jj
> and then would switch to a d
Hi Jochen!!!
green light from my side, that would be a *great* improvement IMHO!!!
Targeting to a different package would at the same time help you
detecting the differences with current code, so filling missing parts
should be less painful.
Thanks a lot in advance for your help and feel free to pi
Merci beaucoup Luc,
IIUC the general consensus shown in the previous thread should be
enough to start working on the sandbox, right?
Bonne soirée,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 11/06/2011 14:08, S
On 6/11/11 2:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 11/06/2011 08:44, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I have looked at this some more and I think we have two choices,
>> depending on how much we want to be able to do in terms of
>> monitoring and instance management. The simplest solution is to
>> enable only holdi
Just do it (as Nike would say)!
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Merci beaucoup Luc,
> IIUC the general consensus shown in the previous thread should be
> enough to start working on the sandbox, right?
> Bonne soirée,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> h
On 6/11/11 4:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> [X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
>> [ ] +/-0
>> [ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
> Interesting project, but is a vote really necessary?
It is not necessary to VOTE to begin work on a new sandbox
component. It is ne
On 6/11/11 4:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 11/06/2011 12:26, Honton, Charles wrote:
>> Please look at java.util.IdentityHashMap again. I think it does
>> everything you're looking for except concurrent access. Given other
>> requirements, I'm not sure a ConcurrentHashMap will buy much performanc
Forgot to add my +1 to accept the code.
Thanks!
Phil
On 6/11/11 10:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/11/11 4:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> [X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
>>> [ ] +/-0
>>> [ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
>> Interesting project, but is a
On 11/06/2011 18:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/11/11 2:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 11/06/2011 08:44, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I too think that the second option is the way to go using system
>> identity hashcodes. I'm not sure that the first option will be faster
>> since iterating through the Li
+1
Oliver
Am 11.06.2011 12:16, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all guys,
after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
spare time to dedicate to oss :D ) to accept Meiyo as a new component
in Sandbox.
I alr
Hello,
I checked out the code today and when I ran 'mvn install', it failed. I've
attached to document for error. Just wanted to know, if this is known
behavior at this time?
I have attached the error log with this email and its compilation error.
Thanks and regards,
Arshad
[INFO] Scanning for proj
Hi Arshad
it is known, I'm in the middle of updating the code, just give me the
time to start :D
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Arshad Ansari wrote:
> Hello,
> I checked out the code today and when I ran 'mvn install', it f
[Posting here because the JIRA web server is down.]
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 06:32:59PM +, Luc Maisonobe (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13047964#comment-13047964
>
Hi Gilles,
Le 11/06/2011 22:22, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
[Posting here because the JIRA web server is down.]
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 06:32:59PM +, Luc Maisonobe (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comme
Hi all,
Can we make a new release ? OGNL is under incubation still but that
shouldn't be a problem.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To uns
Hi Lukasz,
I don't know if you already noticed the Jochen message, but he's
working in order to have OGNL-8 fixed, I'd wait for it before
releasing it.
WDYT? Have a nice weekend, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:55 PM,
Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ?
Thanks in advance
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/6/11 Simone Tripodi :
> Hi Lukasz,
> I don't know if you already noticed the Jochen message, but he's
>
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ?
Dunno. Ask me again in a week or so. :-) Or feel free to take the task over.
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
will do the most wickedest of t
2011/6/11 Jochen Wiedmann :
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart
> wrote:
>
>> Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ?
>
> Dunno. Ask me again in a week or so. :-) Or feel free to take the task over.
Thanks Jochen! I'm asking because we have a critical issue with
S
37 matches
Mail list logo
