The Mina issue is resolved, tests now fail for a different reason.
See for example
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/apache-commons/commons-vfs2-test/gump_file/org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.sftp.test.SftpProviderTestCase.txt.html
Stefan
Vote passes with 3 +1s.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Post the abortive 3.0.2 vote, a first pass at 3.1. I rolled back the
> comparators to be
> considered/argued about for 3.2.
>
> RC1 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.1-RC1/
>
> SV
On 11/14/2011 08:34 PM, sebb wrote:
On 14 November 2011 18:31, sebb wrote:
The default --StartClass is now "Main", and --StopClass defaults to
"java/lang/System" - in which case the default --StopMethod is "exit"
- is that correct?
If so, I can update the docs accordingly.
Updated docs.
H
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
2011/11/15 sebb :
>>>
>>> It's fine to create and drop tags which won't ever be used for a vote.
>>>
>>> But tags that are used as RC tags should be immutable.
>>>
>>> It's better *never* to reuse an RC tag, as a recreated tag can still
>>> cause confusion later on.
>>
>> I'm not understanding the
On Nov 14, 2011, at 19:56, sebb wrote:
> On 14 November 2011 21:15, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:41 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 14 November 2011 18:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 November 2011 15:04, wrote:
>>
On 14 November 2011 22:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> there's no tag for the latest version 22:
>
> %<
> $ svntags
> [snip]
> commons-parent-2/ r560660 | bayard | 2007-07-29 05:42:34 +0200 (Sun, 29 Jul
> 2007)
> commons-parent-20/ r1083359 | sebb | 20
On 14 November 2011 21:15, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:41 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 14 November 2011 18:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 14 November 2011 15:04, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Mon Nov 14 15:04:3
Hi Gang,
there's no tag for the latest version 22:
%<
$ svntags
[snip]
commons-parent-2/ r560660 | bayard | 2007-07-29 05:42:34 +0200 (Sun, 29 Jul
2007)
commons-parent-20/ r1083359 | sebb | 2011-03-20 03:25:40 +0100 (Sun, 20 Mar
2011)
commons-parent-21/ r11
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> The patch I see here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg26521.html
>
> does not apply due to formatting in the email (line lengths I think).
>
> Can you send me (ggregory at apache dor org) the patch (based on HEAD of
> trunk) or post
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:41 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 November 2011 18:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 November 2011 15:04, wrote:
>>> > Author: ggregory
>>> > Date: Mon Nov 14 15:04:32 2011
>>> > New Revision: 1201740
>>> >
>>> > URL: http:
On 14 November 2011 18:31, sebb wrote:
> On 4 November 2011 13:22, sebb wrote:
>> On 4 November 2011 12:52, wrote:
>>> Author: mturk
>>> Date: Fri Nov 4 12:52:08 2011
>>> New Revision: 1197541
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1197541&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Make a code a bit safer o
On 11/14/2011 07:31 PM, sebb wrote:
On 14 November 2011 16:48, Mladen Truk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag @subject and call for a vote later this week.
There are few significant JIRA's fixed crying for a release :)
Comments, objections, ...
Can we include the Maven artifacts in the release vote
On 14 November 2011 18:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 14 November 2011 15:04, wrote:
>> > Author: ggregory
>> > Date: Mon Nov 14 15:04:32 2011
>> > New Revision: 1201740
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1201740&view=rev
>> > Log:
>>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 November 2011 15:04, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Mon Nov 14 15:04:32 2011
> > New Revision: 1201740
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1201740&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Creating commons-codec-1.6-RC1 tag
>
> I think there was
On 14 November 2011 16:48, Mladen Truk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to tag @subject and call for a vote later this week.
> There are few significant JIRA's fixed crying for a release :)
>
>
> Comments, objections, ...
Can we include the Maven artifacts in the release vote please?
It should just be a
On 4 November 2011 13:22, sebb wrote:
> On 4 November 2011 12:52, wrote:
>> Author: mturk
>> Date: Fri Nov 4 12:52:08 2011
>> New Revision: 1197541
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1197541&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make a code a bit safer on invalid parameters. Make sure it doesn't crash a
On 14 November 2011 15:04, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Mon Nov 14 15:04:32 2011
> New Revision: 1201740
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1201740&view=rev
> Log:
> Creating commons-codec-1.6-RC1 tag
I think there was already an RC1 tag.
Ideally, please don't recreate tags.
> Adde
Hi,
I plan to tag @subject and call for a vote later this week.
There are few significant JIRA's fixed crying for a release :)
Comments, objections, ...
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache
Hi Gilles,
- Mail original -
> Hi.
>
> > > [...]
> > >>
> > >> In this case, the new API with boundaries setting should not be
> > >> set
> > >at
> > >> the level of the abstract class that is share by CMA-ES, Bobyqa,
> > >> Nelder-Mead and MultiDirectional.
> > >
> > >You are right but
I mean to send that from my @apache.org account, sorry (don't want to
double send.)
Gary
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Codec 1.6-RC1.
>
> Tag:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec
Good day to you all:
I have prepared Commons Codec 1.6-RC1.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.6-RC1
Site:
https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/codec/1.6/RC1/
Binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-181/
On 14 November 2011 14:10, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Mon Nov 14 14:10:16 2011
> New Revision: 1201713
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1201713&view=rev
> Log:
> [IO-291] Add new function FileUtils.directoryContains.
>
> Added:
>
> commons/proper/io/trunk/src/test/java/org/apa
Hi.
> > [...]
> >>
> >> In this case, the new API with boundaries setting should not be set
> >at
> >> the level of the abstract class that is share by CMA-ES, Bobyqa,
> >> Nelder-Mead and MultiDirectional.
> >
> >You are right but this was considered as a compromise in order to avoid
> >an
> >ad
Hi James!
many thanks in advance!!! All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:51 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> Sounds easy enough, but it might involve rethink
Sounds easy enough, but it might involve rethinking the guts of digester a
bit. Let me "digest" on that a bit, but I think we can do it somewhat
easily.
Sent from tablet device. Please excuse typos and brevity.
On Nov 14, 2011 3:02 AM, "Simone Tripodi" wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I'm writing to as
On 2011-11-13, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> It seems as if VFS was already picking up Mina built from trunk and
>> this version is not compatible with the one VFS2 expects (i.e. it
>> doesn't provide the oa.mina.filter package).
> The package i
Hi all guys,
I'm writing to ask you all a big help on fixing that issues that is
spoling my sweet dreams and completely blocking for the rest :)
The well known issue is that the Digester has been able to create
objects using only the default empty constructor, that is because
instances are created
29 matches
Mail list logo
