Am 18.02.2012 um 19:06 schrieb Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com:
On Feb 18, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 18/02/2012 17:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:00, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Am 18.02.2012 15:25, schrieb Ralph Goers:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19062projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 19 Feb 2012 10:21:02 +
Finished at: Sun 19 Feb 2012 10:21:41 +
Total time: 39s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Hi all,
following previous discussion on ML I opened a JIRA issue to rename
classes/variables related to operations on weights:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-395
I will soon work on it. If there is any last minute suggestion I will be
happy to hear that.
Ciao,
--
Claudio
Le 19/02/2012 09:50, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Am 18.02.2012 um 19:06 schrieb Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com:
On Feb 18, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 18/02/2012 17:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
On Feb 18, 2012, at 11:00, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
I'm +1 as well. A common style would make development easier. I think
configuration files should be downloadable from commons website. Maybe that
will spare some good patch but there are some style issues... replies to
new contributors. ;-)
-1 we've let each component developers the
Hi Claudio,
I will soon work on it. If there is any last minute suggestion I will be
happy to hear that.
there isn't any suggestion by me...
in my point of view your suggestion can be useful and increase the code
expressiveness.
have a nice day :)
--
Marco Speranza marcospera...@apache.org
Hi Marco,
@@ -77,7 +79,7 @@ final class DefaultSpanningTreeAlgorithm
* end while
* pre
*/
-
+ checkNotNull( orderedMonoid, The Boruvka algorithm can't be
calulated with a null
these checks are useless. The check has already been performed at
Hello Simone,
It would be much more naturally to my hears hearing it as
BigDecimalOrderedMonoid, doesn't it?
you have a valid point. However my intention is to decouple
implementations from underlying interfaces, because they might evolve
and grow over time.
Let me give you two examples:
On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:50 AM, Benedikt Ritter b...@systemoutprintln.de wrote:
Am 18.02.2012 um 19:06 schrieb Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com:
I use IntelliJ so obviously I'd want a style that it can handle. FWIW,
Jetbrains provides a free license for the full product for open
On Feb 19, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
I'm +1 as well. A common style would make development easier. I think
configuration files should be downloadable from commons website. Maybe that
will spare some good patch but there are some style issues... replies
Hi Cloud/IO :)
* Doubles can also be multiplied, but so far we did not need to
include that in our stack of operations and properties. If we ever
need to do so, it will be enough to create another interface
extending OrderedMonoid and change the implemented interface in
Unlike Commons, you have to be granted permission to commit at other projects
at the ASF and each of them have their own PMC and build their own
communities. Commons is a single community and thus it makes sense for
developers to be able to easily switch between sub projects. Having
On Feb 19, 2012, at 6:55 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Unlike Commons, you have to be granted permission to commit at other
projects at the ASF and each of them have their own PMC and build their own
communities. Commons is a single community and thus it makes sense for
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org wrote:
On Feb 19, 2012, at 6:55 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Unlike Commons, you have to be granted permission to commit at other
projects at the ASF and each of them have their own PMC and build their own
Hi,
* Doubles can also be multiplied, but so far we did not need to
include that in our stack of operations and properties. If we ever
need to do so, it will be enough to create another interface
extending OrderedMonoid and change the implemented interface in
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org wrote:
On Feb 19, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
wrote:
I'm +1 as well. A common style would make development easier. I think
configuration files should be downloadable from commons website. Maybe
On 19/02/2012 20:26, Simone Tripodi wrote:
So please explain me why the PMC should force OGNL guys on adopting
a different style in a component where just a small subset of commons
people (mainly Struts guys) is interested.
It shouldn't. Those that do the work get to make the decisions.
Mark
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 19/02/2012 20:26, Simone Tripodi wrote:
So please explain me why the PMC should force OGNL guys on adopting
a different style in a component where just a small subset of commons
people (mainly Struts guys) is interested.
GitHub user hgschmie synchronized the pull request at
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/1
Add a Triple tuple class analog to the Pair.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
$ git pull https://github.com/hgschmie/commons-lang trunk
Alternatively
Hi (and sorry for the late)
I personally don't see the reason to be open to *Operations until
*Monoid (actually, wrongly, *Weight) until there is the real need of.
Anyway, please share a patch in the issue you filled - code talks much
better, I could finally see what I am currently missing ;)
Hi Marco,
svn log log message and recorded issue activity in changes.xml are inconsistent
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:26 PM, marcospera...@apache.org
On Feb 19, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
While I agree that checkstyle has to be consistent inside each
component, so I would be +1 on having the plugin in the parent (with
PMD and Findbugs as mentioned by Gary), I am still reluctant with
adopting a general
I think it is reasonable to have Commons wide defaults but let projects
override them if they want to.
that is much more than reasonable, we are on the same path now! :)
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
Author: marcosperanza
Date: Sun Feb 19 21:26:12 2012
New Revision: 1291064
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291064view=rev
...
--- commons/sandbox/graph/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml (original)
+++ commons/sandbox/graph/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml Sun Feb 19 21:26:12
2012
@@
On 19 February 2012 14:55, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Unlike Commons, you have to be granted permission to commit at other
projects at the ASF and each of them have their own PMC and build their own
communities. Commons is a single community and thus it makes sense for
On 14 February 2012 22:03, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying again - I hope I've fixed all the problems found previously.
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.1 based on RC2.
[X] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
tag:
Thanks very much to all who tested the release candidates and voted.
The votes for RC2 were as follows:
+1 (binding)
Gary Gregory
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Mladen Turk
Sebastian Bazley
There were no other votes.
The vote therefore passes.
I will proceed with the release process shortly.
On
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
fixed. Thanks for suggestion :)
have a nice day
--
Marco Speranza marcospera...@apache.org
Google Code: http://code.google.com/u/marco.speranza79/
Il giorno 20/feb/2012, alle ore 00:31, Konstantin Kolinko ha scritto:
Author: marcosperanza
Date: Sun Feb 19 21:26:12 2012
New Revision:
31 matches
Mail list logo
