[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

RE: [math] Logistic, Probit regerssion and Tolerance checks

2012-09-08 Thread marios michaelidis
Hi everyone, I will start with the tolerance and Vif checks, because it is smaller and I want to get familiar with the system. I have created a relevant ticket labelled as I would like to include a VIF and TOLERANCE check for a 2 dimensional double array, vey commonly used by major packages

Re: [math] Logistic, Probit regerssion and Tolerance checks

2012-09-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:50:29AM +0300, marios michaelidis wrote: Hi everyone, I will start with the tolerance and Vif checks, because it is smaller and I want to get familiar with the system. I have created a relevant ticket labelled as I would like to include a VIF and TOLERANCE

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-cli (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-cli has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-08 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb: On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote: Hi all, the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce binary backwards

[configuration] Should we remove list splitting for attributes in XMLConfiguration?

2012-09-08 Thread Oliver Heger
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an attribute node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface, but of course not supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it tries to encode the list as a comma-separated string. On reloading, such strings are

RE: [math] Logistic, Probit regerssion and Tolerance checks

2012-09-08 Thread marios michaelidis
Hi Giles, Per your questions, everything is done, so I just uploaded the class in a txt format. You may run it too and tell me how it performs. The only thing I am not certain is in which package it should go. My proposal is to go with correlations as it checks multi-colinearity. If I got

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-09-08 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] Logistic, Probit regerssion and Tolerance checks

2012-09-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/8/12 8:43 AM, marios michaelidis wrote: Hi Giles, Per your questions, everything is done, so I just uploaded the class in a txt format. You may run it too and tell me how it performs. The only thing I am not certain is in which package it should go. My proposal is to go with

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-08 Thread Ralph Goers
If you are going to break compatibility the package names need to be changed. I really dislike CombinedConfiguration. Having the combined nodes point into other configuration nodes makes reloading fragile which is why it now copies nodes. This means that a DynamicCombinedConfiguration that

Re: [configuration] Should we remove list splitting for attributes in XMLConfiguration?

2012-09-08 Thread Ralph Goers
No objection. I believe this was done because of the way lists are done in property files - a comma separated list of values on a single property. In XML you would just have multiple instances of the element, each with its own value. This is one of the reasons why having the flat

[math] workaround to get site reports to run WAS: Re: [math] spinning BOBYQAOptimizerTest

2012-09-08 Thread Phil Steitz
Per the thread below, mvn site now takes an very, very long time to run on many (most?) platforms, so as a workaround until we figure out how to fix the tests or plugins, here is a quick way to get the basic site generated locally with static analysis reports. Use mvn clean test first to verify

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-08 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 08.09.2012 18:45, schrieb Ralph Goers: If you are going to break compatibility the package names need to be changed. I really dislike CombinedConfiguration. Having the combined nodes point into other configuration nodes makes reloading fragile which is why it now copies nodes. This means

Re: [configuration] Should we remove list splitting for attributes in XMLConfiguration?

2012-09-08 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 08.09.2012 18:49, schrieb Ralph Goers: No objection. I believe this was done because of the way lists are done in property files - a comma separated list of values on a single property. In XML you would just have multiple instances of the element, each with its own value. This is one of

Re: [math] workaround to get site reports to run WAS: Re: [math] spinning BOBYQAOptimizerTest

2012-09-08 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 09/08/2012 07:05 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: Per the thread below, mvn site now takes an very, very long time to run on many (most?) platforms, so as a workaround until we figure out how to fix the tests or plugins, here is a quick way to get the basic site generated locally with static analysis

Re: [math] workaround to get site reports to run WAS: Re: [math] spinning BOBYQAOptimizerTest

2012-09-08 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 09/08/2012 10:21 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 09/08/2012 07:05 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: Per the thread below, mvn site now takes an very, very long time to run on many (most?) platforms, so as a workaround until we figure out how to fix the tests or plugins, here is a quick way to get the

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-imaging (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-imaging has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-graph (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2012-09-08 Thread commons-graph development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-graph has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-chain2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2012-09-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This