Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
> > > > Please review the release candidate and vote. > > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now. > > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > [X] -1 I oppose this release because... > > What is referenced in the pom

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM refers to a lot of old versions for jars. I would update those (Xerces 2.6.2? Wow!) +1 Note that the CI build failed: https://continuum-ci.apache.org/c

Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
-1 for the missing files from the source archives and the French mix up in the FB report. The language in the FindBugs reports can be configured in the plugin config IIRC. I've seen that done recently but can't recall which project. Can we do that from commons-parent? Gary On Sat, Sep 20, 2014

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Thank you for keeping commons-configuration rolling Oliver. I'm +1 for the alpha release, I'll try to post my observations regarding the API in a separate thread. Emmanuel Bourg Le 19/09/2014 22:45, Oliver Heger a écrit : > Hi all, > > this is a vote for the first alpha version of [configuratio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 windows binary package with signed executables

2014-09-20 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 15.09.2014 um 23:05 schrieb Mark Thomas: > All, > > After a few teething problems with the signing service, I now have a > version of the Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Windows binary distribution > where the Windows executables have been digitally signed ready for release. > > The z

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Gary, thanks for your review. Am 20.09.2014 um 14:23 schrieb Gary Gregory: > I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do > as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM > refers to a lot of old versions for jars. I would update those (Xer

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread sebb
On 20 September 2014 20:22, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi Gary, > > thanks for your review. > > Am 20.09.2014 um 14:23 schrieb Gary Gregory: >> I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do >> as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM >> refers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 windows binary package with signed executables

2014-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
How should reviewers test this RC? Gary Original message From: Oliver Heger Date:09/20/2014 09:55 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 windows binary package with signed executables +1 Oliver Am 15.09.2014 u