Fwd: [commons-compress] Git Push Summary

Nice! Gary -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:52 AM Subject: [commons-compress] Git Push Summary To: comm...@commons.apache.org Repository: commons-compress Updated Tags: refs/tags/rel/1.0 [created] c92c8f8b4 refs/tags/rel/1.1

Re: [math] TLP

Commons projects that use Git like Math and Lang are already mirrored on GitHub, See: https://github.com/apache/commons-math https://github.com/apache/commons-lang Gary On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote: > I love the idea. I also think commons will get a

[math] TLP

I would like to propose that we split [math] out into a top level project at the ASF. This has been proposed before, and I have always come down on the side of staying in Commons, but I am now convinced that it is a good step for us to take for the following reasons: 0) We have several

[math] TestUtils name conflict

I recently added a test case where I would have liked to use o.a.c.m.stat.inference.TestUtils, but the test class used the /test-only class o.a.c.m.TestUtils. Any objection to changing the name of the latter to UnitTestUtils or something else? Phil

Re: [Math] "RandomGeneratorAbstractTest" is flawed

On 1/13/16 5:46 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > There are several problems. > > There is a "protected" field ("generator"). > > There is a no-arg constructor that calls a overridable method > ("makeGenerator()"). But the method is thus is called *before* > the subclass's constructor has run. > > That

Re: [math] TLP

I like having [math] in Commons. There are other multi-module projects in Commons, that's not an issue IMO, just good project design. My main worry is more on the overall health of Commons or perception that [math] is "leaving" Commons, the more eyeballs on Commons the better. Gary On Wed, Jan

Re: [math] TLP

... and it looks like watch notifications for these are now enabled. Issues are still going through JIRA though. Cheers, Ole On 01/13/2016 08:16 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Commons projects that use Git like Math and Lang are already mirrored on GitHub, See:

[Math] "RandomGeneratorAbstractTest" is flawed

Hi. There are several problems. There is a "protected" field ("generator"). There is a no-arg constructor that calls a overridable method ("makeGenerator()"). But the method is thus is called *before* the subclass's constructor has run. That method initializes the "generator" field. If the

Re: [math] TLP

+1 On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:50 PM Phil Steitz wrote: > I would like to propose that we split [math] out into a top level > project at the ASF. This has been proposed before, and I have > always come down on the side of staying in Commons, but I am now > convinced that it

Re: [math] TLP

I love the idea. I also think commons will get a lot more eye balls if it gets all the repositories on github and enables the watch button as well as github issues. Cheers, Ole On 01/13/2016 07:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: I like having [math] in Commons. There are other multi-module projects

Re: svn commit: r1724334 - in /commons/proper/weaver/trunk: LICENSE-asm.txt LICENSE.txt RELEASE-NOTES.txt dist/src/assembly/bin.xml dist/src/assembly/src.xml pom.xml

I think I have satisfied the demands of Apache's and ASM's bundling policies. If everyone is satisfied, I will roll RC2 of the release. Matt On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:14 PM, wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Tue Jan 12 23:14:35 2016 > New Revision: 1724334 > > URL:

Re: svn commit: r1724334 - in /commons/proper/weaver/trunk: LICENSE-asm.txt LICENSE.txt RELEASE-NOTES.txt dist/src/assembly/bin.xml dist/src/assembly/src.xml pom.xml

On 12 January 2016 at 23:14, wrote: > Author: mbenson > Date: Tue Jan 12 23:14:35 2016 > New Revision: 1724334 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1724334=rev > Log: > handle ASM binary bundling licensing requirements > > Added: >