Hi cli dev team,
I recently upgraded to the commons-cli version 1.3.1 where the BasicParser is
deprecated. So if I sue the DefaultParser instead, my following sample code
would not work -
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Options options = getOptions();
i
Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer
interested in joining the PMC for the new TLP based on [math].
Thanks!
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
Le 24/01/2016 21:54, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer
> interested in joining the PMC for the new TLP based on [math].
I would be honored to join the new PMC.
best regards,
Luc
>
> Thanks!
>
> Phil
>
>
>
I just kicked off the PMC membership recruiting thread.
I think there are three more immediate things we need to do:
0) decide on a name for the new project
1) agree on initial PMC chair
2) draft a board resolution to form the new project
Post-2), there will be lots of fun to have - scm, web sit
On 1/24/16 1:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer
> interested in joining the PMC for the new TLP based on [math].
>
> Thanks!
>
> Phil
>
Here is my own volunteering :)
Phil
-
T
We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for a boring,
descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy, so won't
be offended if others want to be more creative.
My suggestion is
MathComponents
Hearkens back to HttpComponents, which has worked pretty well.
Phil
--
I guess it depends on the scope of what the new TLP is going to do.
Umbrella projects aren't that popular these days, from what I understand.
Maybe an homage to a famous mathematician? Apache Newton? Apache Euler?
Apache Euclid?
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:08 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
> We need to agr
Maybe Apache Gauss?
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:16 PM James Carman
wrote:
> I guess it depends on the scope of what the new TLP is going to do.
> Umbrella projects aren't that popular these days, from what I understand.
> Maybe an homage to a famous mathematician? Apache Newton? Apache Euler?
> Apa
On Jan 24, 2016 1:08 PM, "Phil Steitz" wrote:
>
> We need to agree on a name. My own preference is for a boring,
> descriptive name, but I am manifestly not a marketing guy, so won't
> be offended if others want to be more creative.
>
> My suggestion is
>
> MathComponents
>
> Hearkens back to Htt
On 1/24/16 2:16 PM, James Carman wrote:
> I guess it depends on the scope of what the new TLP is going to do.
This is slightly jumping the gun, as we do have the opportunity in
forming the new TLP to revisit the initial goals of [math]; but I
suspect that initially at least we will mostly continue
I'd happy and honored to join you all even though I am not a pure math guy.
I believe I may have experience and sometimes a different perspective that
might help (or not ;-)
Gary
On Jan 24, 2016 12:55 PM, "Phil Steitz" wrote:
> Please respond to this thread if you are a Commons Committer
> inter
On Jan 24, 2016 1:46 PM, "Phil Steitz" wrote:
>
> On 1/24/16 2:16 PM, James Carman wrote:
> > I guess it depends on the scope of what the new TLP is going to do.
>
> This is slightly jumping the gun, as we do have the opportunity in
> forming the new TLP to revisit the initial goals of [math]; but
If we are to choose a famous person's name, why not a famous native
American mathematician? I'm not aware of any, but it would be keeping with
the traditions of Apache, being a native American tribe, Geronimo being a
native American chief, as well as a few others. -- H
On 24 January 2016 at 13:51,
I googled that but didn't find anything compelling. I love the idea.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:54 PM Hasan Diwan wrote:
> If we are to choose a famous person's name, why not a famous native
> American mathematician? I'm not aware of any, but it would be keeping with
> the traditions of Apache, b
Just plain and simple "Apache Math" maybe?
Or is it taken already?
Gilles
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:46:17 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 1/24/16 2:16 PM, James Carman wrote:
I guess it depends on the scope of what the new TLP is going to do.
This is slightly jumping the gun, as we do have the opp
I'm okay with that too. Apache Math
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:17 PM Gilles wrote:
> Just plain and simple "Apache Math" maybe?
> Or is it taken already?
>
> Gilles
>
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:46:17 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 1/24/16 2:16 PM, James Carman wrote:
> >> I guess it depends on th
> On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Gilles wrote:
>
> Just plain and simple "Apache Math" maybe?
> Or is it taken already?
It's not taken; but I thought it was too broad-sounding and in fact
umbrella-ish. There are other ASF projects that do math-relates things. I
think adding "components" make
+1
On 22 January 2016 at 05:39, Matt Benson wrote:
> I would like to release the [weaver] component.
>
> Apache Commons Weaver 1.2 RC2 is available for review at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/weaver/ (r11994).
>
> Maven artifacts are at:
> https://repository.apache.org/co
Not a blocker but kind of silly:
Unapproved licenses:
LICENSE-asm5.0.4.txt
This file should be excluded.
Gary
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> I would like to release the [weaver] component.
>
> Apache Commons Weaver 1.2 RC2 is available for review at:
> https://d
Antlib's Clirr report has a lot of errors:
https://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc2/commons-weaver-parent/commons-weaver-antlib/clirr-report.html
This is not documented in the release notes.
Gary
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> I would like to release th
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Antlib's Clirr report has a lot of errors:
> https://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.2-rc2/commons-weaver-parent/commons-weaver-antlib/clirr-report.html
>
> This is not documented in the release notes.
>
I am not -1'ing this but
I like Apache Math as well.
Cheers,
Ole
On 01/24/2016 04:18 PM, James Carman wrote:
I'm okay with that too. Apache Math
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:17 PM Gilles wrote:
Just plain and simple "Apache Math" maybe?
Or is it taken already?
Gilles
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:46:17 -0700, Phil Steitz w
Umbrella-ish is good. Linear algebra, genetic algorithms, neural networks,
clustering, monte carlo, simplex...These need an umbrella. Some of the other
Apache projects that do math may be interested in moving that piece under the
Apache Math umbrella.
Personally I like to see each in a separ
Hi,
I very much like the idea of taking the name of a famous mathematician.
If it has to be some thing more descriptive: Apache Commons HttpClient went
to Apache HttpComponents. How about Apache Math Components as TLP name?
Benedikt
2016-01-25 8:40 GMT+01:00 Ole Ersoy :
> Umbrella-ish is good.
24 matches
Mail list logo
