[Math] About MATH-1345

Hi. Referring to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1345 I propose the following changes: 1. Make default values "private" (rationale: it's an implementation detail). 2. Add a new instance variable in "AbstractRealDistribution" for holding the solver accuracy (which is currently

RE: [VOTE][RRESULT][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.6.1

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:30:10 +, Roger Whitcomb wrote: You're right, of course. "Indemnification" is not the right term. And my point was not necessary, since you were not thinking of fewer votes, but relaxed requirements for the voters. My apologies. ~Roger Whitcomb No problem; I see

Jexl Array

Hi, I have started using JEXL and my scenario is below, x = 10; Some constants [10,20,30,40] may be in an array, if x is in the above set, return *true* else *false* Can anyone tell me how do I create JEXL expressions for the SQL like "IN" statements ? Thanks.

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-Compress #72

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-Compress » Apache Commons Compress #72

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Compress » Apache Commons Compress #71

See Changes: [bodewig] reduce code duplication -- Established TCP socket on 42979 maven3-agent.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor.jar already up to

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Compress #71

See Changes: [bodewig] reduce code duplication -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on jenkins-test-d07 (jenkins-cloud-4GB cloud-slave

Re: [Math] RNG refactoring

I'm not sure if this is the problem, but a good rule of thumb is that if you have pushed a commit you should merge it instead of rebasing it. It looks to me like 6ddf476 and ce8c82f are the same, so I think when you ran rebase it put it on top of the bug fix I pushed up recently, duplicating the

[Math] RNG refactoring

Hi. Last week, and just now, I've pushed local branches that handle the following issues (and others, either related, or set to "Won't fix [in current code]" in JIRA[1]): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1335 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1336

Re: [DISCUSS][CHIMERA] Name for the new component

Le 25/03/2016 15:49, sebb a écrit : > Apache Commons EasyCrypt I like this one. My suggestions: Apache Commons FastCrypt Apache Commons OpenSSL Apache Commons OpenSSL Wrapper (contracted to Apache Commons OSW) Emmanuel Bourg

Re: [DISCUSS][CHIMERA] Name for the new component

On 25 March 2016 at 14:04, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > after we've accepted the Chimera project [1] as new Apache Commons project, > it's time to decide on a name. I've used Apache Commons Crypto in the past, > but some have argued that it isn't to the point. Seems its

[DISCUSS][CHIMERA] Name for the new component

Hi, after we've accepted the Chimera project [1] as new Apache Commons project, it's time to decide on a name. I've used Apache Commons Crypto in the past, but some have argued that it isn't to the point. I'd like to find a name the same way we did it for the potential Math TLP. Just add your

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Configuration 2.0 Released

The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the availability of Apache Commons Configuration 2.0. The Commons Configuration software library provides a generic configuration interface which enables an application to read configuration data from a variety of sources. After a series of alpha

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Hopefully there are enough PMC members to vote for this when they want to release it. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:52 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi all, > > 72 hours have passed, so it's time to tally up the votes: > > Bernd Eckenfels +1 > Luc Maisonobe +1 > Sergio Fernández