Re: [TEXT] TEXT-10 A more complex Levenshtein distance

Hi Don, Could you take a look at the tabs/spaces in the pull request, please? In the meantime, I'll play with the code to see if i) we can use the two-array algorithm instead; where we analyse two lines each time, instead of keeping the whole matrix. Will probably have to compute the

Re: [lang] To Java 7

Oh, neat, I already made the same argument in the linked post, so I have no need to type it all out again. ;) On 23 October 2016 at 21:20, sebb wrote: > That is not what the referenced message says. > > On 24 October 2016 at 03:06, Dave Brosius wrote: > >

Re: [lang] To Java 7

That is not what the referenced message says. On 24 October 2016 at 03:06, Dave Brosius wrote: > Of course not. people with ancient builds never touch anything. > > > > On 10/23/2016 09:49 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> Do you really think the users who are paying for extended

Re: [lang] To Java 7

Of course not. people with ancient builds never touch anything. On 10/23/2016 09:49 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: Do you really think the users who are paying for extended Java 6 support are upgrading any of their dependencies anymore? On 23 October 2016 at 20:42, sebb wrote: It

Re: [lang] To Java 7

I do not see why we should handcuff ourselves like that to Java 6 either. Gary On Oct 23, 2016 6:50 PM, "Matt Sicker" wrote: > Do you really think the users who are paying for extended Java 6 support > are upgrading any of their dependencies anymore? > > On 23 October 2016 at

Re: [lang] To Java 7

Do you really think the users who are paying for extended Java 6 support are upgrading any of their dependencies anymore? On 23 October 2016 at 20:42, sebb wrote: > It seems that Java 6 is still supported until Dec 2018 if the user > purchases Extended Support. > > There are

Re: [lang] To Java 7

It seems that Java 6 is still supported until Dec 2018 if the user purchases Extended Support. There are users who cannot or will not upgrade until then [1] [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6ad212d930574a4fc3c149242561fb7228b272d9b80a4daaeee4326f@%3Cuser.commons.apache.org%3E On 23

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

On 23/10/16 19:28, Eric Barnhill wrote: >> >>> Interesting! I think also looking at what is already existing in >> the commons library your contribution is clearly on the image processing >> side. Is that right? It's badly needed. I also would love to have it. >> Crucial point here is that this

Re: [math] IIR filter library (Butterworth,Bessel,...)

> > >> Interesting! I think also looking at what is already existing in > the commons library your contribution is clearly on the image processing > side. Is that right? It's badly needed. I also would love to have it. > Crucial point here is that this is in signal processing terminology >

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-Lang #67

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-Lang » Apache Commons Lang #67

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Lang » Apache Commons Lang #66

See Changes: [pascalschumacher] StringUtils#replacePattern: fix source code formatting [ggregory] [LANG-1144] [ggregory] Order entries by type. [ggregory] [LANG-1279] Update Java requirement from Java 6

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-Lang #66

See Changes: [pascalschumacher] StringUtils#replacePattern: fix source code formatting [ggregory] [LANG-1144] [ggregory] Order entries by type. [ggregory] [LANG-1279] Update Java requirement from Java 6 to 7.

Re: [lang] To Java 7

+1, maybe there are some new features that can be added that are relevant to JDK 7 besides just language level cleanups. On 23 October 2016 at 07:07, Dave Brosius wrote: > +1 > > > On 10/23/2016 03:30 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> Hi All: >> >> Now that 3.5 is out, I think

Re: [lang] To Java 7

+1 On 10/23/2016 03:30 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All: Now that 3.5 is out, I think it is time to require Java 7. Thoughts? Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [lang] To Java 7

+1, in line with earlier discussed upgrade path we can then do a Java 7 minor version before we jump to Java 8. On 23 Oct 2016 9:39 am, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > I don't see improvements from a user perspective when upgrading to Java 7, > but Java 6 is long EOL. So +1 from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

Hi Benedikt, On 23.10.16 10:51, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > The build works with Java 8 and Maven 3.3.9. > > But the md5 and SHA1 files are missing in the dist area. > > -1 > I thought the signatures were sufficient. I added the check sums with r16631. Please check again.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2 based on RC1

Hello Thomas, The build works with Java 8 and Maven 3.3.9. But the md5 and SHA1 files are missing in the dist area. -1 Benedikt Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Fr., 21. Okt. 2016 um 19:42 Uhr: > I would like to beta-release the [jcs] component. > > Apache Commons JCS 2.0-beta-2

Re: [lang] To Java 7

I don't see improvements from a user perspective when upgrading to Java 7, but Java 6 is long EOL. So +1 from my side. Pascal Schumacher schrieb am So., 23. Okt. 2016 um 09:31 Uhr: > +1 > > Am 23.10.2016 um 09:30 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > Hi All: > > > > Now that 3.5

Re: [lang] To Java 7

+1 Am 23.10.2016 um 09:30 schrieb Gary Gregory: Hi All: Now that 3.5 is out, I think it is time to require Java 7. Thoughts? Gary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands,

[lang] To Java 7

Hi All: Now that 3.5 is out, I think it is time to require Java 7. Thoughts? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition