Re: [RNG][ALL] Official vs "courtesy" code ?

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:01:11 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: Preface: This thread, the questions it contains, as well as other recent emails in general feels like the result of the normal learning curve one must go through when dealing with a Maven multi-module project. This is time well-spent IMO

Re: [LANG] Support recursion in ReflectionToStringBuilder and deprecate RecursiveToStringStyle?

Am 23.11.2016 um 21:29 schrieb Duncan Jones: To create a deep toString() representation of an object, one must use a combination of ReflectionToStringBuilder and RecursiveToStringStyle. IMO this confuses behaviour and presentation. LANG-1249 is an example of the problems the original design

Re: [VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component

+1 Oliver Am 23.11.2016 um 14:47 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes: > [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a > concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator] > > Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding > of its purpose, developed and released

Re: [text][lang] string escaping

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > On Nov 24, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > I just found that longestCommonPrefix does not exist in [lang]... let's > > sort through what we have first before we imagine

Re: [text][lang] string escaping

> On Nov 24, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I just found that longestCommonPrefix does not exist in [lang]... let's > sort through what we have first before we imagine ourselves more headaches > ;-) > Fair, I more meant to pose an interesting example of

Re: [text][lang] string escaping

I just found that longestCommonPrefix does not exist in [lang]... let's sort through what we have first before we imagine ourselves more headaches ;-) Gary On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Rob Tompkins

Re: [text][lang] string escaping

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:38 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Benedikt Ritter > > wrote: > > > >> Hello Gilles > >> > >> Gilles

Re: [RNG][ALL] Official vs "courtesy" code ?

Preface: This thread, the questions it contains, as well as other recent emails in general feels like the result of the normal learning curve one must go through when dealing with a Maven multi-module project. This is time well-spent IMO as most non-trivial (>1 jar) projects are multi-module

Re: [RNG] Aggregate artefacts (for archive download)

Within the assembly descriptor you can use a for the modules you want to include. See https://github.com/apache/commons-jcs/blob/trunk/commons-jcs-dist/src/assembly/bin.xml for example, here the assembly is done in a -dist submodule itself, but it can also be done directly in the parent as long

Re: [VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component

Fair enough. Thanks. On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > (... sorry got interrupted) > ... there are arguments for a commons component, but it could also be > arguments having a dedicated community. So I wanted to express that with an > abstain. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component

(... sorry got interrupted) ... there are arguments for a commons component, but it could also be arguments having a dedicated community. So I wanted to express that with an abstain. Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:02 PM +0100, "Bernd Eckenfels"

Re: [VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component

Hello, Thank you for the summmary. I was aware of the incubation and the discussion on rdf-dev. There are arguments for a common component,  Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:05 PM +0100, "Sergio Fernández" wrote: Hi Bern On

[RNG][ALL] Official vs "courtesy" code ?

Hi. The "Commons RNG" component (in the "Apache Commons" sense), consists of the following modules (in the "maven" sense) that provide Java code: (1) commons-rng-client-api (2) commons-rng-core (3) commons-rng-simple (4) commons-rng-sampling (5) commons-rng-jmh (6) commons-rng-examples

Re: [text][lang] string escaping

Hello Rob, Rob Tompkins schrieb am Do., 24. Nov. 2016 um 14:55 Uhr: > > > On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:38 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Benedikt Ritter > > wrote: > > > >> Hello Gilles > >> > >>

Re: [text][lang] string escaping

> On Nov 22, 2016, at 4:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: > >> Hello Gilles >> >> Gilles schrieb am Di., 22. Nov. 2016 um >> 20:55 Uhr: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Nov

[RNG][ALL] Release policy for version < 1 ?

Hi. The stalling of a "Commons RNG Utils" component pushed me to go on with creating a "commons-rng-sampling" module, primarily because of the Gaussian sampling functionality.[1] Already, this has the consequences which I painted several times: much less thought has been put into the design of

[MATH] [Complex] FFT

Since FFT discussions appear to have begun...I have long noticed that the FFT in CM is only a Radix-4 implementation. Bernd, is improving the performance of the CM FFT be something that interests you? Either way, I should be able to pick up activity here in a couple of weeks, and I could look

Re: [Filter] Better name? (Was: [math] IIR filter library [...])

Hi. On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:15:10 +, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hello Gilles, Gilles schrieb am Mi., 23. Nov. 2016 um 14:34 Uhr: Hi Bernd, Eric (and others). I was about to request a JIRA project for the "filter" component.[1] We usually use the sandbox

Re: [Filter] Better name? (Was: [math] IIR filter library [...])

Hello. On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:20:10 +, Bernd Porr wrote: Hi Gilles, I like the idea of "SigProc". Filter is a bit too narrow especially when we also include more exoctic processing and/or analysis etc. In terms of complex: the filter package uses complex numbers but that's totally

Re: [VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component

Hi Bern On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > +0 Undecided as there where no activity on commons-dev it feels to me > like an other home would be better > That topic was already discussed: http://markmail.org/message/u6wumpabst35xknn Basically we

Re: [Filter] Better name? (Was: [math] IIR filter library [...])

Hello Gilles, Gilles schrieb am Mi., 23. Nov. 2016 um 14:34 Uhr: > Hi Bernd, Eric (and others). > > > I was about to request a JIRA project for the "filter" component.[1] > We usually use the sandbox jira project and just add a new component there, because we

Re: [Filter] Better name? (Was: [math] IIR filter library [...])

Hi Gilles, I like the idea of "SigProc". Filter is a bit too narrow especially when we also include more exoctic processing and/or analysis etc. In terms of complex: the filter package uses complex numbers but that's totally transparent to the user so for those who are not into DSP might

Re: [RNG] Aggregate artefacts (for archive download)

Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:12:33 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: >> You use the assembly plugin. >> >> mvn assembly:single >> > > After running > $ mvn clean deploy assembly:single -Prelease -Ptest-deploy > > There is no single archive file containing all the distribution. > [Neither