Re: [Numbers] Scope?

2017-01-29 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi, Shouldn't [numbers] focus only on number structures (fractions, complex) and the basic operations on them? I'm not sure the solvers fit in the scope. Emmanuel Bourg Le 30/01/2017 à 02:17, Gilles a écrit : > Hi. > > Anyone has a statement about it? > > Functionalities that are candidates to

Re: [Numbers] Scope?

2017-01-29 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Gilles, > Am 30.01.2017 um 02:17 schrieb Gilles : > > Hi. > > Anyone has a statement about it? > > Functionalities that are candidates to be moved from "Math" > to "Numbers": > * FastMath I just thought, maybe FastMath would fit into Commons Lang. WDYT? Benedikt (Sorry for OT posting :

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

2017-01-29 Thread Gary Gregory
You can't blame the debugger too much when all the metadata you have for code location is a file name and line number... ;-) Gary On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > I blame the state of debuggers more so than lambdas. I've yet to see a Java > debugger that can properly handle

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

2017-01-29 Thread Matt Sicker
I blame the state of debuggers more so than lambdas. I've yet to see a Java debugger that can properly handle any sort of fluent DSL, and lambdas make fluent DSLs far more common now. On 29 January 2017 at 20:45, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > > > On Jan 29, 2017, at 9:24 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

2017-01-29 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Jan 29, 2017, at 9:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I know someone would reply with some Java 8 lamba... but that will never be > as easy to ready as a method name like isEmpty or hasSomething... > At my day job a bunch of folks got giddy over the new java 8 functionality and ended up wri

Re: StringUtils.isEmpty() family of methods on Objects

2017-01-29 Thread Gary Gregory
I know someone would reply with some Java 8 lamba... but that will never be as easy to ready as a method name like isEmpty or hasSomething... Gary On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > Like Bene, this feels a little off to me. Just for argument's sake, let's > look at: > > Optio

[Numbers] Scope?

2017-01-29 Thread Gilles
Hi. Anyone has a statement about it? Functionalities that are candidates to be moved from "Math" to "Numbers": * FastMath * CombinatoricsUtils [1] * ContinuedFraction [1] * special functions [1] * solvers * MathArrays [2] * MathUtils [1] * ... Thanks, Gilles [1] With redesigned API (e.

Re: [Numbers] Parsing and formatting classes

2017-01-29 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:15:02 +0100, Gilles wrote: On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:36:07 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Gilles wrote: Hi. On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:38:21 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: [...] Now, for the contents of the "fraction" module. (1) My main c

Re: RDF commons testing

2017-01-29 Thread Peter Ansell
Hi Claude, Abstract test classes are working well for Commons RDF so far. Others may benefit from your solution, so feel free to suggest the approach to others who may be interested in exploring it. Cheers, Peter On 30 January 2017 at 03:11, Claude Warren wrote: > Peter, > > I have written a m

Re: [Numbers] Parsing and formatting classes (Was: Further work on NUMBERS-6)

2017-01-29 Thread Raymond DeCampo
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:36:07 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >> Hi. >>> >>> On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:38:21 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: >>> >>> [...] > > Now, for the contents of

Re: [Numbers] Parsing and formatting classes (Was: Further work on NUMBERS-6)

2017-01-29 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:36:07 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Gilles wrote: Hi. On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:38:21 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: [...] Now, for the contents of the "fraction" module. (1) My main current concern is the formatting-related classes; a

Re: RDF commons testing

2017-01-29 Thread Claude Warren
Peter, I have written a more detailed discussion of why abstract tests for interfaces pose problems ( https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/contract-testing-why-abstract-tests-enough-claude-warren-jr). I stand by my earlier assertions and offers. Claude On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Peter Ansell wr

Re: [Numbers] Further work on NUMBERS-6

2017-01-29 Thread Raymond DeCampo
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 14:38:21 -0500, Raymond DeCampo wrote: > >> [...] >>> >>> Now, for the contents of the "fraction" module. >>> >>> (1) >>> My main current concern is the formatting-related classes; as for >>> "complex", I think that >>>

Re: commons-numbers git commit: NUMBERS-6: Make NumbersArithmeticException [...]

2017-01-29 Thread Gilles
Hi Ray. The "throws" clauses should be removed from the method declarations. Thanks, Gilles On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:16:40 + (UTC), raydeca...@apache.org wrote: Repository: commons-numbers Updated Branches: refs/heads/fraction__NUMBERS-6 fe27e8ec9 -> dca007d22 NUMBERS-6: Make NumbersAri