Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release commons-jelly-1.0.1 based on RC6

2017-09-24 Thread Benedikt Ritter
> Am 24.09.2017 um 02:50 schrieb Rob Tompkins : > > The following votes were case: > > Gary Gregory +1 (binding) > Oliver Heger +1 (binding) > Rob Tompkins +1 (binding) > > Thus, the vote passes. > > Many thanks to all who voted. I will proceed with the release processing. Good job! Sorry, I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 24.09.2017 um 18:31 schrieb sebb: The document is missing a step (just added). Thanks! I have added the same redirects for commons discovery. Cheers, Pascal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For

Re: [ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread sebb
On 24 September 2017 at 13:35, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Am 24.09.2017 um 14:31 schrieb sebb: >>> >>> to: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/launcher >>> >>> Synchronization of the git mirror >>> (git://git.apache.org/commons-launcher.git) has been deactivated. >>> >>> The websi

[GitHub] commons-text issue #64: Minor JavaDoc change for deprecated isDelimiter

2017-09-24 Thread arunvinudss
Github user arunvinudss commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/64 Hey @PascalSchumacher! In my understanding we didn't make a decision yet. A part of the reason is that it was exposed as a public method and since consumers would potentially lose a function

[GitHub] commons-text issue #65: Sort pom file

2017-09-24 Thread arunvinudss
Github user arunvinudss commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/65 Hey @PascalSchumacher ! I looked at a couple of other commons projects but seems like we don't have and/or follow a standard for pom files. Each have their own way of listing things.

[GitHub] commons-text issue #64: Minor JavaDoc change for deprecated isDelimiter

2017-09-24 Thread PascalSchumacher
Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/64 Thanks for the pull request. Imho we should make it absolutely clear that users should not use this method. Therefore I'm against making the formulation "softer". --- ---

[GitHub] commons-text issue #65: Sort pom file

2017-09-24 Thread PascalSchumacher
Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/65 Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm against merging this, as this makes the order different from other commons projects. Replacing `/>` with `>` makes no sense imho (why make xml

[GitHub] commons-text issue #65: Sort pom file

2017-09-24 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/65 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/13407074/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/13407074) Coverage remained the same at 98.236% when pulling **d293d605353509f88b0468

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #65: Sort pom file

2017-09-24 Thread arunvinudss
GitHub user arunvinudss opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/65 Sort pom file You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/arunvinudss/commons-text sort-pom-file Alternatively you can review and

[GitHub] commons-text issue #64: Minor JavaDoc change for deprecated isDelimiter

2017-09-24 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/64 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/13407041/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/13407041) Coverage remained the same at 98.236% when pulling **f972a5b87f57ac93476bf3

[GitHub] commons-text pull request #64: Minor JavaDoc change for deprecated isDelimit...

2017-09-24 Thread arunvinudss
GitHub user arunvinudss opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-text/pull/64 Minor JavaDoc change for deprecated isDelimiter @chtompki Please review and merge. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/arunv

Re: Moving component to dormant - Make JIRA read-only?

2017-09-24 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 24/09/2017 à 14:28, sebb a écrit : > I would be inclined to leave it open. > Might be useful to collect reports against the component, even if > nothing is planned to be done with them at present. +1 Emmanuel Bourg - To unsu

Re: Move of Commons Transaction dormant incomplete

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Infra deactivated the github mirror a few weeks ago. Cheers, Pascal Am 21.08.2017 um 08:34 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: Am 20.08.2017 um 12:30 schrieb Pascal Schumacher : Hello everybody, there is a jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRANSACTION-39 from 2010 with the steps to move

Re: [ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 24.09.2017 um 14:31 schrieb sebb: to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/launcher Synchronization of the git mirror (git://git.apache.org/commons-launcher.git) has been deactivated. The website has moved from: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-launcher/ There ought to b

Re: Moving component to dormant - Make JIRA read-only?

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
commons discovery already had this JIRA description: "RELEASE PLAN: Project considered to be dormant - no release planned. " I copied this for commons launcher. Am 24.09.2017 um 14:28 schrieb sebb: The Attic is only for TLPs, not components of a TLP. It's up to the Commons PMC whether or not

Re: [ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread sebb
On 24 September 2017 at 13:12, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hi, > > since no development has happened for a long while, the Apache Commons > Launcher component > has been moved to dormant. No further development is expected. > > The SVN location has changed from: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/c

Re: Moving component to dormant - Make JIRA read-only?

2017-09-24 Thread sebb
The Attic is only for TLPs, not components of a TLP. It's up to the Commons PMC whether or not JIRA should be made read-only. I would be inclined to leave it open. Might be useful to collect reports against the component, even if nothing is planned to be done with them at present. Perhaps update

[ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hi, since no development has happened for a long while, the Apache Commons Launcher component has been moved to dormant. No further development is expected. The SVN location has changed from: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/launcher to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/

[ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Discovery moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hi, since no development has happened for a long while, the Apache Commons Discovery component has been moved to dormant. No further development is expected. The SVN location has changed from: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/discovery to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/

[ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Discovery moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hi, since no development has happened for a long while, the Apache Commons Discovery component has been moved to dormant. No further development is expected. The SVN location has changed from: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/discovery to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/common

Re: Moving component to dormant - Make JIRA read-only?

2017-09-24 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
I think dormant  means no activity, but anyone could try to restart work on the component (tho I could be wrong). So maybe we should do it when moving to the attic instead? Bruno Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 21:42, Pascal Schumacher wrote: Hello everybody, my un

Moving component to dormant - Make JIRA read-only?

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hello everybody, my understanding is that the JIRA of dormant components should be made read-only. Is that correct? (I'm asking because https://commons.apache.org/releases/moving-to-dormant.html does not mention this.) Thanks, Pascal -

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 2.2.1

2017-09-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
As announced on the list, I would like to release the [jcs] component to resolve a cdi performance issue ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-183). Maven artifacts are at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1269/ The Subversion tag is: http://svn.apache.o