[GitHub] commons-io pull request #60: Minor fix in method doc

2018-05-17 Thread koraytugay
GitHub user koraytugay opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/60 Minor fix in method doc Minor fix in method doc You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/koraytugay/commons-io patch-1

Re: [Statistics] Port codes from Commons Math

2018-05-17 Thread Gilles
Hi Gimhana. On Fri, 18 May 2018 00:16:04 +0530, Gimhana Nadeeshan wrote: Hi all, We might want to create a public branch for that work in order to merge PRs more quickly without risk of breaking "master". What do you think? Eric? I ported the Statistics Interval Module and would like to

Re: [Numbers] "Experimental" release?

2018-05-17 Thread Gilles
Hi. On Thu, 17 May 2018 10:28:05 -0600, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All, Note that strictly speaking, we only publish source code. Binary files like jar files are only provided as a convenience. Apache Subversion, for example, leaves binary production and distribution to third parties. So a

Re: [io] Black Duck apparently sees vulnerability in 2.5

2018-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
WRT releasing, the new file system class needs to be finished/cleanup or removed. Gary On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-05-17, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > > > Am 16.05.2018 um 08:24 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > > >> Also, would there be any

Re: [io] Black Duck apparently sees vulnerability in 2.5

2018-05-17 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-05-17, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Am 16.05.2018 um 08:24 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: >> Also, would there be any reason to not cut a new release from master? I >> mean is there any work in progress that needs to be finished? > I think a new release from master can be done any time. Thanks,

Re: [Statistics] Port codes from Commons Math

2018-05-17 Thread Gimhana Nadeeshan
Hi all, We might want to create a public branch for that work in order to > merge PRs more quickly without risk of breaking "master". > What do you think? Eric? > I ported the Statistics Interval Module and would like to get your reviews. How should I make the Pull request ? Best Regards,

Re: [io] Black Duck apparently sees vulnerability in 2.5

2018-05-17 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 16.05.2018 um 08:24 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: Also, would there be any reason to not cut a new release from master? I mean is there any work in progress that needs to be finished? I think a new release from master can be done any time. -Pascal

Re: [Numbers] "Experimental" release?

2018-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All, Note that strictly speaking, we only publish source code. Binary files like jar files are only provided as a convenience. Apache Subversion, for example, leaves binary production and distribution to third parties. So a "partial release" would mean a "partial release" of sources, as

[release-plugin] The type package-info is already defined

2018-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
Is this a valid warning? Description Resource Path Location Type The type package-info is already defined package-info.java /commons-release-plugin/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/release/plugin line 1 Java Problem The type package-info is already defined package-info.java

Re: [maven-scm-api] Looking to perform svn remote move

2018-05-17 Thread Gary Gregory
Could we also just do an Ant Mojo that executes SVN's svnmucc directly? Gary On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 7:12 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Hello maven guys, > > Over on commons we’ve been writing our own release-plugin, and have the > idea to do the release promotion using a

[maven-scm-api] Looking to perform svn remote move

2018-05-17 Thread Rob Tompkins
Hello maven guys, Over on commons we’ve been writing our own release-plugin, and have the idea to do the release promotion using a mojo. The goal here would be do do something analogous to svn mv . Is that available in the [maven-scm-api]? At first read it doesn’t look like it. Would you

[Numbers] "Experimental" release?

2018-05-17 Thread Gilles
Hi. I only got one response to my previous question about a "partial" release of the code currently in [Numbers], which was to make a "beta" release. I guess that it meant an "experimental" release of *everything* even of code with known issues (big or small). The first release would be e.g.

[GitHub] commons-io pull request #6: Introduce threadlocal buffers to avoid memory al...

2018-05-17 Thread berndhopp
Github user berndhopp closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/6 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org