Hi Bajit,
Thanks for your input. Can you please provide some examples of what you mean
here? Why exactly should it be removed and how would that improve the API? The
Point interface is the central interface of the geometry code and allows us to
write algorithms that work across multiple spaces
That’s what I switched to. -Rob
> On Apr 11, 2019, at 2:44 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> An alternative would be to use SystemUtils.isJavaVersionAtMost the have
> behavior depending on the current Java versions. This would preserve the
> behavior for users on Java < 12.
>
> Benedikt
>
> Am
An alternative would be to use SystemUtils.isJavaVersionAtMost the have
behavior depending on the current Java versions. This would preserve the
behavior for users on Java < 12.
Benedikt
Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2019 um 16:32 Uhr schrieb Rob Tompkins :
> I like that. I’ll get that sorted out.
>
> -Rob
Am Di., 9. Apr. 2019 um 15:24 Uhr schrieb Rob Tompkins :
> We want a jira for this?
>
I usually only create jira for things that impact users of the lib. So
changes to the API or the behavior. But that's just my personal
convention... :)
Benedikt
>
> -Rob
>
> > On Apr 9, 2019, at 9:14 AM,
Hi All:
Now that 2.6.2 is out, I plan on updating from Java 7 to Java 8.
Gary
Something seems to be awry with gitbox (generally??). -Rob
> On Apr 11, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> The merge I just did in
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/
>
> for
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/commit/7def2938b14845e6d095ae82e6db8efe6ff8e24a
>
>
> is
The merge I just did in
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/
for
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/commit/7def2938b14845e6d095ae82e6db8efe6ff8e24a
is not reflected in
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-vfs.git
Thoughts?
Gary
Hello,
I’m new to contributing to the Apache projects, so please ignore any rookie
mistakes (like proposing new changes on JIRA). With that said, I proposed the
following in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-49:
Binding generic interfaces and classes with Point does not have any
Running 'mvn clean package' also works on Amazon Corretto 8 and 11:
Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
2018-10-24T14:41:47-04:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.0\bin\..
Java version: 11.0.2, vendor: Amazon.com Inc., runtime: C:\Program
Hi All:
Do we want to keep
https://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/pool/old/bad/v1.0/ ?
Gary
+1
Based on git tag.
Maven RAT check OK.
Maven CLIRR check OK.
RM reports look OK.
Building 'mvn -V clean package' OK using:
Apache Maven 3.6.0 (97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3;
2018-10-24T14:41:47-04:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.6.0\bin\..
Java version: 1.8.0_202, vendor:
This VOTE passes with 3 +1 binding votes from the following PMC members:
- Rob Tompkins
- Gary Gregory
- Bruno P. Kinoshita
Gary
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:51 PM Bruno P. Kinoshita
wrote:
> [x] +1 Release these artifacts
>
> Building passing with `mvn clean install`, then `mvn site` (failed
On 11/04/2019 13:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
[...]
Not adding a dedicated method would mean everyone has to do this:
JumpableUniformRandomProvider rng = (JumpableUniformRandomProvider)
RandomSource.create(…)
But adding a mirror methods:
JumpableUniformRandomProvider
> > [...]
>
> Not adding a dedicated method would mean everyone has to do this:
>
> JumpableUniformRandomProvider rng = (JumpableUniformRandomProvider)
> RandomSource.create(…)
>
> But adding a mirror methods:
>
> JumpableUniformRandomProvider RandomSource::createJumpable(…)
>
Note: I have changed the subject line to prefix using [rng] since this
is not related to [GSoC] but to the [rng] component.
On 11/04/2019 08:15, Abhishek Dhadwal wrote:
Dear Sir,
I have applied for the Apache ICLA, and built the project using - mvn clean
package
I have already used maven
Dear Sir,
I have applied for the Apache ICLA, and built the project using - mvn clean
package
>> I have already used maven to build the project. Should I try running
>> benchmark tests on the SecureRandom algorithms as discussed ? If so, are
>> there any guidelines/ data on doing so ?
>This is
16 matches
Mail list logo
