Re: [numbers][fraction] pulling fraction-dev into master

2019-06-06 Thread Eric Barnhill
Changed are merged; in particular the travis updates were kept; if you are working on Fraction kindly rebase. On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 3:40 PM Eric Barnhill wrote: > For some months I worked on the Fraction class on a fraction-dev branch, > now others are furthering it, but IIUC working off of mas

Re: [math] MATH-1486 and release 3.6.2

2019-06-06 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. Le jeu. 6 juin 2019 à 18:14, Stephen Colebourne a écrit : > > I've raised a GitHub PR [1] to add the Java 9 module name to [math] on > the MATH_3_X branch. Assuming that is merged, I'm willing to raise > another PR with the necessary bits to prepare the repo to release > v3.6.2. > > This a

[math] MATH-1486 and release 3.6.2

2019-06-06 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I've raised a GitHub PR [1] to add the Java 9 module name to [math] on the MATH_3_X branch. Assuming that is merged, I'm willing to raise another PR with the necessary bits to prepare the repo to release v3.6.2. This approach sidesteps all issues with commons-4 and does the minimum necessary for d

Re: [RNG] Re: [commons-rng] 04/11: RNG-75: Use SplitMix64.next()

2019-06-06 Thread Alex Herbert
On 06/06/2019 16:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. Not sure about the changes below. It seems to me that "nextLong()" ensures that a "long" is generated, while "next()" could, if the RNG type is later changed, return an "int" cast to "long" (i.e. half its bits set to zero). Regards, Gilles Goo

Re: [RNG] Re: [commons-rng] 04/11: RNG-75: Use SplitMix64.next()

2019-06-06 Thread Alex Herbert
On 06/06/2019 16:07, Gilles Sadowski wrote: Hi. Not sure about the changes below. It seems to me that "nextLong()" ensures that a "long" is generated, while "next()" could, if the RNG type is later changed, return an "int" cast to "long" (i.e. half its bits set to zero). Regards, Gilles Goo

[RNG] Re: [commons-rng] 04/11: RNG-75: Use SplitMix64.next()

2019-06-06 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Not sure about the changes below. It seems to me that "nextLong()" ensures that a "long" is generated, while "next()" could, if the RNG type is later changed, return an "int" cast to "long" (i.e. half its bits set to zero). Regards, Gilles Le jeu. 6 juin 2019 à 10:00, a écrit : > > This is

Re: [All] Alpha/beta releases

2019-06-06 Thread sebb
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 23:40, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > I see two lines of usage IRL from people: > > - I use whatever is "released" on Maven Central. I quote the word released > since that includes ANY artifacts, pre 1.0 like a 0.87 or -alpha, and > -betas. N.B. This by definition exclu