The release was approved with the following votes
- +1 sebb (binding)
- +1 Gary Gregory (binding)
- +1 Bruno P. Kinoshita (binding)
- +1 Gary Lucas (non-binding)
Thanks to all votes. I will prepare the release in the next hours.
Cheers
Bruno
On Sunday, 2 August 2020, 11:54:01 am NZST, Brun
My own vote
[x] +1 Release these artifacts
Bruno
On Sunday, 2 August 2020, 11:54:01 am NZST, Bruno P. Kinoshita
wrote:
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since
Apache Commons Imaging 1.0-alpha1 was released, so I would like to release
Apache Com
I successfully built the latest version of code using the following:
Apache Maven 3.6.1 (d66c9c0b3152b2e69ee9bac180bb8fcc8e6af555;
2019-04-04T15:00:29-04:00)
Maven home: C:\Users\gwluc\Documents\Applications\apache-maven-3.6.1\bin\..
Java version: 1.8.0_211, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
Precisely. That’s another technique we’ve used in rng.
-Ropb
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 11:01 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Or alternatively, if using random values each time, have it retry the
> test with a different value. It's typically better to use an actual
> property testing library for these typ
Or alternatively, if using random values each time, have it retry the
test with a different value. It's typically better to use an actual
property testing library for these types of tests anyways. One example
library I found is https://jqwik.net/ (these types of testing
libraries are more common in
Since I'm in the code base anyway I'll see if I can look at it this
weekend and include it in my PR with the Dockerfile.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:56 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This is all fine and good but how would you fix the test such that it does
> not fail randomly. PR anyone?
>
> Gary
>
>
Choose a seed value for the `new Random()` constructor and the tests
will be deterministic.
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 09:57, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > This is all fine and good but how would you fix the test such that it does
> > not fail
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This is all fine and good but how would you fix the test such that it does
> not fail randomly. PR anyone?
Either static inputs for determinism, or putting a probabilistic boundary in
which the solution can fall.
-Rob
>
> Gary
>
> On
This is all fine and good but how would you fix the test such that it does
not fail randomly. PR anyone?
Gary
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:54 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
> The ECC stuff I mostly learned about from various Bernstein papers
> like this one: https://cr.yp.to/newelliptic/nistecc-20160106.pd
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:53 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> The ECC stuff I mostly learned about from various Bernstein papers
> like this one: https://cr.yp.to/newelliptic/nistecc-20160106.pdf
Reminds me a lot of the Poincare Disk model….very interesting!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincaré
The ECC stuff I mostly learned about from various Bernstein papers
like this one: https://cr.yp.to/newelliptic/nistecc-20160106.pdf
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 09:50, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> >
> > Well, for testing RNGs, I can understand using pr
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Well, for testing RNGs, I can understand using property testing, yes.
> It would also be useful for testing fuzzing scenarios like making sure
> the GCM tag is invalid for any random input data (giving a near zero
> probability of valid dat
Well, for testing RNGs, I can understand using property testing, yes.
It would also be useful for testing fuzzing scenarios like making sure
the GCM tag is invalid for any random input data (giving a near zero
probability of valid data) or that an elliptic curve implementation
doesn't leak out info
> On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:33 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Now I hope we don't have unit tests depending on non-static state for
> its random number generator! ;)
We actually do have a considerable number of those in our projects where we use
probabilistic epsilons on the output. See commons-rng.
Now I hope we don't have unit tests depending on non-static state for
its random number generator! ;) I'd expect a crypto library's test
suites to include several hard-coded known-good and known-bad
ciphertexts with static keys/IVs similar to the test cases presented
in their RFCs (especially since
I agree that a minimal bump to Java 7 is reasonable here.
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 14:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:37 AM Xeno Amess wrote:
>
> > why not go directly to 8?
> > I don't think there be lots of java7 users...
> >
>
> This is just about building and maintenance co
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:37 AM Xeno Amess wrote:
> why not go directly to 8?
> I don't think there be lots of java7 users...
>
This is just about building and maintenance convenience, we've not released
this component in ages, and I do not plan on working on it. I am trying to
get all Commons to
why not go directly to 8?
I don't think there be lots of java7 users...
Gary Gregory 于2020年8月6日周四 下午9:33写道：
> Hi All,
>
> In order to simplify building, I'd like to update the Commons Exec Java
> platform requirement from the dead as a doornail version 6 to the mostly
> dead version 7.
>
> Gary
Hi All,
In order to simplify building, I'd like to update the Commons Exec Java
platform requirement from the dead as a doornail version 6 to the mostly
dead version 7.
Gary
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:31 AM Alex Remily wrote:
> No problem. I'll do it when I get home tonight.
>
Thanks Alex!
Gary
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020, 8:25 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Would you mind creating that ticket with that info?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> >
> > On Thu,
No problem. I'll do it when I get home tonight.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020, 8:25 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Would you mind creating that ticket with that info?
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020, 08:10 Alex Remily wrote:
>
> > That is an intermittent issue that I haven't been ab
Hi Alex,
Would you mind creating that ticket with that info?
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020, 08:10 Alex Remily wrote:
> That is an intermittent issue that I haven't been able to reliably
> reproduce. As I recall, the test that's failing is supposed to fail, but
> in a different way. I t
That is an intermittent issue that I haven't been able to reliably
reproduce. As I recall, the test that's failing is supposed to fail, but
in a different way. I think it's supposed to fail because of a short
buffer but occasionally fails because of an internal error, and when that
happens this t
The Apache Commons team are pleased to announce the release of
Apache Commons Net version 3.7.
The Commons Net library implements the client side of many basic
Internet protocols.
The purpose of the library is to provide fundamental protocol access,
not higher-level abstractions.
This is a bug fi
24 matches
Mail list logo
