On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
>
> There are no current warnings in the main code.
>
> However, I've just discovered that this is because the warnings have been
> suppressed, regardless of whether that is justified or not
On 04/30/2013 11:09 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 21:54, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>> On 04/30/2013 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> I've just been looking at fixing generics warnings in the test code.
>>>
>>> There are no current warnings in the main
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.3 based on RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.2:
* Change Bundle-SymbolicName in the manifest to
"org.apache.commons.logging"
The files:
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus:
https://repository.
mmanuel Bourg
>
>
> Le 02/05/2013 20:43, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.3 based on RC1.
> >
> > This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.2:
> >
> > * Ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2013 11:15 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 03/05/2013 10:01, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
>> Tbh, I do not know if the ant scripts still work. I also did not
>> touch them when doing the 1.1.2 release afair.
>
> It is use
On 05/02/2013 08:43 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.3 based on RC1.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.1.2:
>
> * Change Bundle-SymbolicName in the manifest to
>
Hi,
currently, the Bag interface states that it violates the Collection
contract. This is mainly because the interface was defined like that,
but could be easily changed.
As we are not binary compatible anymore with previous releases, it would
be the right time to do this now (or leave it as it i
On 05/13/2013 09:19 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 May 2013 19:06, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> currently, the Bag interface states that it violates the Collection
>> contract. This is mainly because the interface was defined like that,
>> but could be easily ch
On 05/14/2013 07:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Can someone (Luc) try this CP version or trunk with commons [IO]. I was
> able to run 'mvn clean site' with M3.0.5 and Java 7 on Win7 but it almost
> took an hour! As opposed to a couple of minutes with CP 28.
>
> I am hoping that this is a weird thing
On 05/13/2013 08:06 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently, the Bag interface states that it violates the Collection
> contract. This is mainly because the interface was defined like that,
> but could be easily changed.
>
> As we are not binary compatible anymore w
in collections I already filter it like this:
org.apache.rat
apache-rat-plugin
site-content/**/*
...
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> I've just done a test with IO, and the speed problem see
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.3 based on RC2.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC1:
* fix ant build script: version, dependencies, created artifacts
The files:
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus:
https://repository.apache.org/conten
On 05/16/2013 10:28 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.3 based on RC2.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC1:
>
> * fix ant build script: version, dependencies, created artifact
Hi,
based on the question on the user-ml, I did an experiment with the
NewtonRaphson solver, and I get some strange results, see below:
@Test
public void testSquare() {
final UnivariateDifferentiableFunction d = new
UnivariateDifferentiableFunction() {
public double
Hello.
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of
commons-logging-1.1.3.
Commons Logging is a thin adapter allowing configurable bridging to
other, well known logging systems.
Source and binary distributions are available for download
from the Apache Commons download site:
ht
On 01/15/2013 02:00 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> I just fixed a couple of errors in the User Guide. There are likely
>>> lots more and
/commons/math3/geometry/partitioning/utilities/AVLTreeTest.html
this displays the html formatted source code.
Thomas
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> On 01/15/2013 02:00 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Thomas Neidh
On 05/23/2013 05:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/23/13 1:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
>> plotting functions (was ok for simple scatter plots) use something like
>> jfreechart.
>> Is it ok to i
On 05/23/2013 08:53 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 23/05/2013 17:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 5/23/13 1:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
>>> plotting functions (was ok for simple scatte
On 05/23/2013 09:48 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 08:53 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 23/05/2013 17:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> On 5/23/13 1:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>>> I would like to create more examples, but instead of creating my own
>&
On 05/28/2013 08:20 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:04:32 -, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Tue May 28 16:04:32 2013
>> New Revision: 1486982
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1486982
>> Log:
>> [MATH-851] Added method MathArrays.convolve, thanks to Clemens Novak
>> fo
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013 20:47:30 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2013 08:20 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:04:32 -, t...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: tn
>&
Any feedback on this?
I am really curious if there is a misunderstanding from my side or if there
is a bug.
Thomas
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> based on the question on the user-ml, I did an experiment with the
> NewtonRaphson solver, an
Hi,
to start working on the Monte Carlo engine (see MATH-463) I would like to
break this thing up in multiple pieces. One thing that could be added
independently is the concept of a stochastic process (e.g. Wiener,
BrownianMotion, ...).
The code in the contribution is already a pretty good start,
On 06/03/2013 04:12 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I am working on MATH-437, which entails deprecating a class and
> creating a new one to replace it. It would be good to deprecate in
> a 3.x and remove in 4.0. I see we have no 3.x defined. As of now,
> clirr is not showing any compat errors. Should
On 05/28/2013 08:20 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:04:32 -, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Tue May 28 16:04:32 2013
>> New Revision: 1486982
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1486982
>> Log:
>> [MATH-851] Added method MathArrays.convolve, thanks to Clemens Novak
>> fo
On 06/03/2013 04:10 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/3/13 4:18 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> to start working on the Monte Carlo engine (see MATH-463) I would like to
>> break this thing up in multiple pieces. One thing that could be added
>> independent
On 05/13/2013 08:06 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently, the Bag interface states that it violates the Collection
> contract. This is mainly because the interface was defined like that,
> but could be easily changed.
>
> As we are not binary compatible anymore w
Hi,
all issues for 4.0 are closed now, the release notes up-to-date, the
site almost complete, no checkstyle and findbugs warnings remaining, so
I would say we are really close to a RC1.
I would be grateful if somebody with experience in the ant build scripts
could take a look and further clean u
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
based on RC1.
The files:
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-060/org/apache/commons/commons-collections4/4.0-alpha1/
Distribution files:
https://dist.apa
On 06/24/2013 10:09 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
Hi Oliver,
> first of all: Many thanks for your energy you put into this component!
> You really did a great job!
thanks for the kind words!
> Unfortunately, I do not have the time to have a closer look at the API,
> so I can only vote ba
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 21:31, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > On 06/24/2013 10:09 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Hi Oliver,
> >
> >> first of all: Many thanks for your energy you put into th
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
> based on RC1.
>
> The files:
>
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor
On 06/26/2013 02:11 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Thomas Neidhart
> mailto:thomas.neidh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
> based on
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
> based on RC1.
>
> The files:
>
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositor
On 06/27/2013 11:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 June 2013 10:20, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
>>&
On 06/27/2013 10:41 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 June 2013 21:12, sebb wrote:
>> On 27 June 2013 20:44, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> On 06/27/2013 11:44 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>> On 27 June 2013 10:20, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at
On 06/28/2013 01:40 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 June 2013 22:23, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 06/27/2013 10:41 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 27 June 2013 21:12, sebb wrote:
>>>> On 27 June 2013 20:44, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>>>> On 06/27/2013 11:44 AM, seb
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
based on RC2.
The following changes have been applied since RC1:
* upgrade to maven-javadoc-plugin 2.9.1 (due to CVE-2013-1571)
* fixed COLLECTIONS-474, thanks to sebb
* fixed download page (contained wrong component id)
On 07/01/2013 09:06 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I find the class name CompliantBag pretty confusing. Compliant with what?
> The Javadoc says Collection so, why not call it BagCollection?
I agree that CompliantBag is not a very good choice, but the notation in
collections was to name dec
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Anshul Zunke wrote:
> Do we have 2 way hashmap in collections? If not i think we shuld have it
>
You may want to take a look at the BidiMap interface:
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-collections/javadocs/api-release/org/apache/commons/collections/BidiMap
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> first of all: many thanks for the great effort you put into collections. I
> think aside from math and lang, collections is probably one of the most
> used components. It's really cool to see this happening. So here is my
On 07/02/2013 05:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> CompliantBag is just terrible, I'm sorry.
>
> If we want to follow [DecoratorType][CollectionType] then CollectionBag?
+1
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.ap
On 07/02/2013 07:02 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
>> based on RC2.
>>
>> The following changes have been applied since RC1:
>>
>> *
On 06/30/2013 11:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Collections 4.0-alpha1
> based on RC2.
>
> The following changes have been applied since RC1:
>
> * upgrade to maven-javadoc-plugin 2.9.1 (due to CVE-2013-157
Hi,
just to make sure we have agreement on this topic.
Reading again the thread about release alpha/beta releases I think we did
not reach consensus whether to publish alpha releases to maven central.
It would be easier for people to try out things, but the release will stay
there forever and som
snapshots for commons components. Is this intended?
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/
Thomas
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just to make sure we have agreement on this topic.
> Reading again the thread about release alpha/beta release
I added it for consistency with the other decorators which all have a
similar method.
Thomas
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Do we really need the method
> org.apache.commons.collections4.BagUtils.collectionBag(Bag) ?
>
> All it does is:
>
> public static Bag collect
On 07/05/2013 10:24 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just to make sure we have agreement on this topic.
> Reading again the thread about release alpha/beta releases I think we
> did not reach consensus whether to publish alpha releases to maven central.
>
> It would be
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of
commons-collections4-4.0-alpha1!
Commons Collections is a project to develop and maintain collection
classes based on and inspired by the JDK collection framework.
Collections 4 uses the generics features of Java 5 and is not compatible
On 07/04/2013 10:20 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we had this discussion lately where we talked about attracting new
> contributors for commons [1]. Over the past few days I've been thinking
> about this topic again and I've come to the conclusion that there are
> several things we could do
On 07/14/2013 07:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I think we have talked about this before but did not achieve
> consensus or at least never got it set up. I am finishing the
> javadoc for Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (MATH-437) and would really
> like to just embed Tex formulas in the class javadoc. I fo
On 07/18/2013 09:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 July 2013 19:54, Gilles wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:02:34 +0100, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 July 2013 17:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
sebb wrote:
> The MATH code base currently generates hundreds of boxing warnings.
>
On 07/18/2013 10:48 PM, Ajo Fod wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> There is a lot of work in API design. However, Konstantin's point is that
> it takes a lot of effort to convince Gilles of any alternatives. API design
> issues should really be second to functionality. This idea seems to be lost
> in conve
On 07/22/2013 05:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I would like to use getNatural and shuffle from RandomDataGenerator
> outside of that class (inside [math] I need to efficiently generate
> random n-m partitions of {0, ..., n + m - 1}). I think getNatural
> could go into MathArrays and shuffle could ju
Dear Olaf,
it looks like that the filename in the data source is not properly
extracted.
Your change would work for ISO-8859-15 encoded filenames but maybe not for
other encodings, so we should fix this in a general way.
Could you please create an issue on the bug tracker
https://issues.apache.or
rmatI
> can create an issue, but I can't attach the original email because it's a
> customer email with contract-data.
> I try to reproduce this bug with an other email.If a had success, I create
> an issue in the tracking system.
>
> Regard
> Olaf K.
>
&g
Hi,
its now quite a while since we released 4.0-alpha1 but unfortunately we
did not receive any feedback so far (neither have been any issues reported).
So, if somebody already used it (successful or not), please share your
impressions / experiences.
Thanks,
Thomas
On 08/27/2013 08:23 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 27.08.2013 15:57, schrieb Phil Steitz:
>> On 8/27/13 6:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
>>> It was mentioned the other day, so I thought I would propose a formal
>>> discussion. Is it time to let [math] "leave the nest"? I would doubt
>>> there are very
On 09/09/2013 09:02 PM, Renato Cherullo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to implement a way to recover some important information from
> SimplexSolver's final tableau.
> I'll start by the shadow price, which seems very straight forward. If I
> understand it correctly, I must:
> 1- Store the original Li
On 09/09/2013 10:37 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 09:02 PM, Renato Cherullo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I need to implement a way to recover some important information from
>> SimplexSolver's final tableau.
>> I'll start by the shadow pri
Hi,
while looking at the new fluent API implemented for the
fitting.leastsquares package, I was wondering why some of the interfaces
used for providing input data are in this package:
* WithMaxEvaluations
* WithMaxIterations
* WithConvergenceChecker
are used by AbstractOptimizer in the optim
On 09/17/2013 04:22 PM, Evan Ward wrote:
> Hi Luc,
>
> On Mon 16 Sep 2013 12:04:21 PM EDT, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have started (at last) to work on the fluent API for ODE integrators.
>> It seems to be well suited for the needs, and would allow a better
>> separation of the inte
On 10/06/2013 09:44 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> James,
>
> thank you.
>
> I believe Commons is in a bad shape.
>
> Look at Commons Collections. Before 4 years somebody
> said Guava is more modern, he his answer seems to be widely accepted.
> http://stackoverflow.com/a/167/690771
> This
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.2 based on RC1.
Email 1.3.2 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/email/
(svn revision 3275)
Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachec
On 10/16/2013 07:39 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I have issue when builing on the command line -
>
>> mvn clean install
>
> Oct 16, 2013 10:39:02 AM org.subethamail.smtp.server.ServerThread run
> INFO: SMTP server *:2510 stopped
> emailMessage
> =
On 10/16/2013 12:20 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.2 based on RC1.
>
> Email 1.3.2 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/email/
> (svn revision 3275)
Hi Jonathan,
yes, you did not miss anything, there is no generated code in
commons-collections. All classes in source folder src/main/java would
belong to your "productive code" category, while classes in folder
"src/test/java" would belong to "test code".
If you need an example of generated code
Hi Benedikt,
just add a reportSets definition to your checkstyle plugin, then the
aggregate results will not be published:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-checkstyle-plugin
...
checkstyle
See for example the configuration in commons-math.
Thomas
On
On 10/19/2013 01:21 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The decomposition solvers can "invert" non-square matrices. There
> is no documentation describing what exactly is being returned in
> these cases. It is not obvious to me exactly what conditions the
> returned value satisfies in each case when the act
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.2 based on RC2.
Changes since RC1:
- fixed unit test SimpleHtmlEmail.testDefaultMimeCharset which
failed in certain environments
Email 1.3.2 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/em
On 10/20/2013 09:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>
>> [...]
>
> I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
> Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an upp
On 10/20/2013 11:24 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: tn
> Date: Sun Oct 20 21:24:45 2013
> New Revision: 1533990
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1533990
> Log:
> [MATH-1039] Avoid code duplication by calling logDensity itself.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org
On 10/20/2013 11:34 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:15:18 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 09:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>>>> Hi.
&
Ok np, there are other cases where the code could be simplified, I will do
the necessary changes.
Thomas
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/20/13 2:27 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > On 10/20/2013 11:24 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: tn
>
Hi,
there are now 3 failing unit tests related to the recently added
logDensity / logProbability methods.
I guess this is because the original patch was created before we
increased the tolerance values for several tests.
Imho, we should regenerate the test values for higher precision.
Thomas
-
On 10/21/2013 11:56 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/21/13 2:36 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Mon Oct 21 21:36:37 2013
>> New Revision: 1534389
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1534389
>> Log:
>> Add reference test values for ZipfDistribution.logProbability.
>>
>> Added:
>> c
Hi Sean,
while looking at the QRDecomposition, it is interesting that the threshold
value provided to the constructor of QRDecomposition is only used to pass
it on the the Solver created by getSolver().
Imho, it would be more logical to chose the singularity threshold when
calling getSolver() for
On 10/20/2013 06:51 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.2 based on RC2.
>
> Changes since RC1:
> - fixed unit test SimpleHtmlEmail.testDefaultMimeCharset which
> failed in certain environments
>
>
Hi all,
although it is such a long time, but I was curious whether we should try
to also make a 3.2.2 release with the most annoying bugs that exist in
the 3.2.x branch?
This release is still in widely used, and unlikely to go away soon, so
from a maintainence point of view we should do something
On 10/25/2013 01:35 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 October 2013 08:53, wrote:
>> Author: henning
>> Date: Thu Oct 24 07:53:37 2013
>> New Revision: 1535297
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1535297
>> Log:
>> Feedback from RC1.
>>
>>
>> Added:
>>
>> commons/proper/configuration/branches/RELEASE_1_1
Hello.
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of
commons-email-1.3.2.
Commons-Email aims to provide an API for sending email. It is built on
top of the JavaMail API, which it aims to simplify.
Commons Email can be downloaded from the following page:
http://commons.apache.or
On 10/27/2013 08:45 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> I dug into this a while ago but then didn't found the time to push this
> further. Here is what I've learned
>
> - Switching the main site is not a bit deal. Just add the skin to the
> site.xml and your good to go.
> - Switching compo
On 09/14/2013 08:56 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Agreed, this stuff is looking good to me. I wonder if we should update the
> commons logo itself, perhaps using the "commons" from the various component
> logos.
the existing (old) commons logo does not go well with the new fluido
skin imho, at least th
[1]
>
> What do you think?
>
> [1] http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/
>
> Bruno P. Kinoshita
> http://kinoshita.eti.br
> http://tupilabs.com
>
>
>
>>
>
>> From: Thomas Neidhart
>> To: Commons Develope
On 10/29/2013 08:40 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> Thanks @Gary!
>
> @Thomas, take a look at https://github.com/netomi/commons-skin-fluido/pull/1.
> It
> should fix the footer and sidebar width & external link icon.
>
> Let me know if that works.
Hi Bruno,
your changes look good, I have int
On 10/31/2013 05:18 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:53:29 +, sebb wrote:
>> On 31 October 2013 14:24, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:37:02 +, sebb wrote:
On 31 October 2013 13:26, Gilles wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Are there criteria about filling
On 10/14/2013 08:39 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Can someone add my wiki name (AteDouma) to the Contributors Group page [1]?
>
> Thanks, Ate
>
> [1] https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ContributorsGroup
Could somebody please add me to some group so that I can change some
pages on the wiki? My wiki name is
On 10/30/2013 12:37 AM, Matt Adereth wrote:
> I'm not impatient, just following the instructions from the developer guide
> which says to nudge if a patch goes unnoticed for a few days...
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-814
Hi Matt,
thanks for the patch and nudge. Your patch is co
Hi,
I can remember that a while ago there was the suggestion to include the
latest release version + release date for each commons component on the
main page.
The idea was really appealing to me, and I did an update of the
commons-site to include this information.
The result can be seen here:
h
On 11/02/2013 01:17 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 November 2013 00:07, sebb wrote:
>> On 1 November 2013 23:36, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I can remember that a while ago there was the suggestion to include the
>>> latest release version + r
oftware which is
available via maven itself.
Thomas
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bruno P. Kinoshita
> http://kinoshita.eti.br
> http://tupilabs.com
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Thomas Neidhart
>> To: Commons Developers List
>
On 11/02/2013 09:29 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/02/2013 01:17 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 2 November 2013 00:07, sebb wrote:
>>> On 1 November 2013 23:36, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I can remember that a while ago there
Hi,
I have seen this open feature request and was willing to contribute it
based on the referenced JAMA code.
Are there any objections against using the JAMA code in commons-math,
otherwise I would go ahead.
Thomas
-
To unsubsc
On 01/11/2012 08:21 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Sébastien,
> My problem is: how to do that?
> 1. Extend RealLinearOperator? That would allow for compile time
> checks. The problem is I've already defined
> InvertibleRealLinearOperator. So how about operators which are both
> invertible
On 01/12/2012 12:28 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
[snip]
> I agree with you that any linear operator is "transposable" (don't
> even know whether this word makes sense in english). However,
> RealLinearOperator have been implemented for operators which are *not*
> known in closed-form
Hi,
some of you may already recognize my name, as I have contributed some
code to math in the past months. Since today I have been accepted as
committer for commons and would like to continue working especially on
the math component.
I have an interest in optimization, linear algebra and genetic
On 01/24/2012 12:56 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi Thomas.
Hi Gilles,
[snip code review]
thanks for looking into all the messages, I will fix them according to
your suggestions.
@issue: I was hesitating to assign the issue to myself as it was opened
by Phil, but I will do so in the future if i
On 01/25/2012 01:13 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> It thus becomes urgent to tackle the remaining blocking issues.
> Can we please make a list of those, and of all practical matters that
> prevent the preparation of the release?
Hi,
a release quite soon would also be appreciated from my side.
As
On 02/02/2012 11:57 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:40:14AM +, Continuum@vmbuild wrote:
>
> The failure is unrelated to the commit, but has to do with this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-588
>
> I don't know whether the test tolerance is too stri
301 - 400 of 870 matches
Mail list logo
