GitHub mirrors both the svn and git repos for ASF projects, so you get the
advantages either way. Merging pull requests from GitHub is easier via git,
but they do provide .patch files as well which work just as well in svn.
On 5 November 2016 at 13:54, Eric Barnhill
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 19:54:02 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote:
Speaking for myself either is fine. I find svn commands easier to
deal with
than git, but github is easy to use as a site.
I find the above a little contradictory but since you are
going to manage this, it's up to you. ;-)
Gilles
Speaking for myself either is fine. I find svn commands easier to deal with
than git, but github is easy to use as a site.
Eric
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 09:53:01 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
>> Is this a vote of some sort
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 09:53:01 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote:
Is this a vote of some sort to convert from svn?
Not really (at least if your question is whether I ask to
convert the whole sandbox, or all sandbox components).
I thought that a sandbox component had to use the same repository
as all
Is this a vote of some sort to convert from svn? So far we've all been
pretty on board with migrating Commons projects to git.
On 4 November 2016 at 16:27, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I noticed that the "Text" component uses "git".
> It would be simpler to also use
Hello.
I noticed that the "Text" component uses "git".
It would be simpler to also use git for the "filter" component.
Regards,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands,