On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 at 21:38, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> you should take a look at:
>
> https://github.com/Ekryd/sortpom
>
> that allows customization...and has useful defaults.
I did, but it is not able to handle inline comments correctly.
Also it reformats text blocks.
Given that
Hi,
you should take a look at:
https://github.com/Ekryd/sortpom
that allows customization...and has useful defaults.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 18.08.19 12:45, sebb wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 at 10:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi everyone,
Why not using a plugin allowing to
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 at 10:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Why not using a plugin allowing to put it in parent pom instead of a
> script? >> tidy-maven-plugin
I looked at Tidy, but it does not support customisation of the order.
Also it does not preserve comment placement, nor
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 at 09:59, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> 2019-08-15 23:54 UTC+02:00, sebb :
> > I've produced a draft layout on the Wiki.
> > Comments welcome!
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/yg94Bw
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 14:43, Matt Sicker wrote:
> >>
> >> The layout you
Hi everyone,
Why not using a plugin allowing to put it in parent pom instead of a
script? >> tidy-maven-plugin
Le dim. 18 août 2019 à 10:59, Gilles Sadowski a
écrit :
> 2019-08-15 23:54 UTC+02:00, sebb :
> > I've produced a draft layout on the Wiki.
> > Comments welcome!
> >
2019-08-15 23:54 UTC+02:00, sebb :
> I've produced a draft layout on the Wiki.
> Comments welcome!
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/yg94Bw
>
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 14:43, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>
>> The layout you propose sounds reasonable to me.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:32, sebb
I've produced a draft layout on the Wiki.
Comments welcome!
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/yg94Bw
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 14:43, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> The layout you propose sounds reasonable to me.
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:32, sebb wrote:
>
> > The Ruby tool and some sample
The layout you propose sounds reasonable to me.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:32, sebb wrote:
> The Ruby tool and some sample output:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/scripts/
> examples/
> pomskel.rb
>
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 14:08, sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 13:06,
The Ruby tool and some sample output:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/scripts/
examples/
pomskel.rb
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 14:08, sebb wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 13:06, Claude Warren wrote:
> >
> > Since the POM is an XML document how about a simple XSLT that will convert
> >
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 13:06, Claude Warren wrote:
>
> Since the POM is an XML document how about a simple XSLT that will convert
> them all to the same format.
Unfortunately I don't think it's simple.
Comments on their own line apply to the following tag -- but not always.
And a comment at the
Since the POM is an XML document how about a simple XSLT that will convert
them all to the same format.
Alternatively an XML diff could be performed where each leaf node is
contextualized by generating the the path from the root to the leaf, the
can be sorted and a standard diff performed to
I think it might be useful to try to work towards standardising the
order of sections within POMs.
This will make it easier to compare them across components.
(e.g. to see why one pom works and another fails!)
And should be easier to maintain.
In particular, I would like to move the developer
12 matches
Mail list logo
