Date:08/22/2014 06:12 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [BCEL] Trying a release?
> On 2014-08-22, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Okay... TBH, I don't like that BCEL is treated special. Looks like a
>> different versioning schema to me. Also ot
No but fine by me
Original message From: Gary Gregory
Date:08/25/2014 6:25 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [BCEL] Trying a release?
Hm... did we discuss going to Java 6 or 7. 5 is pretty dead.
Gary
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Dave Brosius
Hm... did we discuss going to Java 6 or 7. 5 is pretty dead.
Gary
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
> I think the driving thing is that it is bumped up to jdk1.5 from 1.4
>
>
>
> On 08/25/2014 05:08 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
>> Le 22/08/2014 12:12, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
I think the driving thing is that it is bumped up to jdk1.5 from 1.4
On 08/25/2014 05:08 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 22/08/2014 12:12, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
If BCEL6 can be used as a drop in replacement, then not changing the
coordinates might be a good idea (but begs the question of why
Le 22/08/2014 12:12, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> If BCEL6 can be used as a drop in replacement, then not changing the
> coordinates might be a good idea (but begs the question of why it has a
> new major version).
I asked about the next version number back in April and the consensus
was that a maj
I do not think we should change the maven coordinates if the package name does
not change. Sebb, can you clarify?
Gary
Original message From: Stefan Bodewig
Date:08/22/2014 06:12 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [BCEL] Trying a release?
On 2014-08
On 2014-08-22, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Okay... TBH, I don't like that BCEL is treated special. Looks like a
> different versioning schema to me. Also other groupId and artifactId. But
> if you RM, it's your decision :-) I won't block a release because of this
> if BCEL was always released like th
2014-08-22 10:51 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
> Le 22/08/2014 09:55, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>
> > How do you feel about the breaking changes and the maven coords change?
>
> The impact of these changes is actually minor, the interfaces have so
> many methods they are never implemented directly, t
Le 22/08/2014 09:55, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> How do you feel about the breaking changes and the maven coords change?
The impact of these changes is actually minor, the interfaces have so
many methods they are never implemented directly, the empty
implementations are always used instead. I hav
2014-08-22 9:37 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
> Le 22/08/2014 08:54, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> > I've uploaded the current site of BCEL to my apache space:
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/bcel-6.0-SNAPSHOT/
>
> Thank you Benedikt, I still volunteer to manage this release since I
> have again
Le 22/08/2014 08:54, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> I've uploaded the current site of BCEL to my apache space:
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/bcel-6.0-SNAPSHOT/
Thank you Benedikt, I still volunteer to manage this release since I
have again a proper Internet connection. Everything is ready, the
+1
On 08/22/2014 02:54 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
I've uploaded the current site of BCEL to my apache space:
http://people.apache.org/~britter/bcel-6.0-SNAPSHOT/
We have 12 clirr errors, because some methods have been added to the
org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor
interface. Since we already bu
I've uploaded the current site of BCEL to my apache space:
http://people.apache.org/~britter/bcel-6.0-SNAPSHOT/
We have 12 clirr errors, because some methods have been added to the
org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor
interface. Since we already bumped the major version number vom 5 to 6,
since seems
Hi guys,
several projects are waiting for a Java 8 compatible BCEL release and since
nobody else seems to have the time to do it, I'll have a look at it this
weekend. Please let me know if you see anything that needs fixing.
Benedikt
--
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutpri
14 matches
Mail list logo
