Changed sandbox folder name to "sigproc".
Eric
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Bernd Porr wrote:
>
> > Hi Gilles,
> >
> > I like the idea of "SigProc". Filter is a bit too narrow especially
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Bernd Porr wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> I like the idea of "SigProc". Filter is a bit too narrow especially when
> we also include more exoctic processing and/or analysis etc.
>
I agree. Plain "Filter" is way too vague and this is not a generic
Hi.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:15:10 +, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hello Gilles,
Gilles schrieb am Mi., 23. Nov. 2016
um
14:34 Uhr:
Hi Bernd, Eric (and others).
I was about to request a JIRA project for the "filter" component.[1]
We usually use the sandbox
Hello.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:20:10 +, Bernd Porr wrote:
Hi Gilles,
I like the idea of "SigProc". Filter is a bit too narrow especially
when we also include more exoctic processing and/or analysis etc.
In terms of complex: the filter package uses complex numbers but
that's totally
Hello Gilles,
Gilles schrieb am Mi., 23. Nov. 2016 um
14:34 Uhr:
> Hi Bernd, Eric (and others).
>
>
> I was about to request a JIRA project for the "filter" component.[1]
>
We usually use the sandbox jira project and just add a new component there,
because we
Hi Gilles,
I like the idea of "SigProc". Filter is a bit too narrow especially when
we also include more exoctic processing and/or analysis etc.
In terms of complex: the filter package uses complex numbers but that's
totally transparent to the user so for those who are not into DSP might
Hi Bernd, Eric (and others).
I was about to request a JIRA project for the "filter" component.[1]
The name "FILTER" is not taken (as a JIRA project) but it would
be better if we are sure that the name will stick (rather than have
to later change the JIRA id or keep one that would not be close