Le 27/04/2011 13:50, sebb a écrit :
> On 27 April 2011 12:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Was it decided to use
>> @version $Id$
>> instead of
>> @version $Revision$ $Date$
>> ?
>
> Or even
>
> @version $Revision$
>
> So long as we don't use $Date$ I don't care
>
>> If so, the corres
On 27 April 2011 12:56, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Was it decided to use
> @version $Id$
> instead of
> @version $Revision$ $Date$
> ?
Or even
@version $Revision$
So long as we don't use $Date$ I don't care
> If so, the corresponding check in "checkstyle.xml" must be changed.
>
>
> Reg
Hi.
Was it decided to use
@version $Id$
instead of
@version $Revision$ $Date$
?
If so, the corresponding check in "checkstyle.xml" must be changed.
Regards,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.o
