It has been a long time since the last release of Apache Commons
FileUpload, so I'd like to release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on
RC1.
Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/fileupload (rev 13750)
Maven artifac
+1
>From src zip: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.
Also src tar gz: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.
>From src zip: mvn clean site OK.
All reports OK except Checkstyle:
I assume the Checkstyle violations are not new compared to 1.3.1. I cannot
tell because our site is for 1.4-SNAPSHOT
https://commons.apache.org/proper/com
+1
Thanks for your work, Benedikt.
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1
>
> From src zip: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.
> Also src tar gz: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.
>
> From src zip: mvn clean site OK.
>
> All reports OK except Checkstyle:
>
> I assume the Checkstyle violations are not new
Build (maven) works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.8. Site looks good.
The binary distribution is a bit different from other Commons releases:
It only contains the jar in a lib subfolder (no source or javadoc jar),
and the release notes are missing. But I don't think this is blocking.
So +1
Oliver
My
My +1 for this release.
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Mo., 23. Mai 2016 um
17:23 Uhr:
> It has been a long time since the last release of Apache Commons
> FileUpload, so I'd like to release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on
> RC1.
>
> Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 RC1 is available for revi
My vote: +1 (binding)
FYI - dist sha1 checksums according to svn r13750
6650d1c878b1142a0c8e3be3534ad24d6f422fc2
binaries/commons-fileupload-1.3.2-bin.tar.gz
0d1004f3aab4ecc62b2fb14056b9c92489d79121
binaries/commons-fileupload-1.3.2-bin.zip
6f254ad51f5e2c9d9a039995bc1a2295cabc95f6
source/commons-
+1 (binding)
i do have some remarks/discussion points:
RELEASE-NOTES.txt contains the site link as http instead of https, I
had the impression we wanted to switch the defaults?
Is the site planned to be "rolled back" to 1.3.2 or will it stay
1.4-SNAPSHOT?
Gruss
Bernd
Am Mon, 23 May 2016 15:23
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> i do have some remarks/discussion points:
>
> RELEASE-NOTES.txt contains the site link as http instead of https, I
> had the impression we wanted to switch the defaults?
>
> Is the site planned to be "rolled back" to 1.3.2
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> RELEASE-NOTES.txt contains the site link as http instead of https, I
> had the impression we wanted to switch the defaults?
Should be sufficient to keep that in mind for the future, as the http
URL still works.
It is something, we all go
This vote passes with the following votes:
- Gary Gregory: +1
- Jochen Wiedmann: +1
- Benedikt Ritter: +1
- Stian Soiland-Reyes: +1
- Bernd Eckenfels: +1
I'll continue with the release procedure.
Thank you for reviewing!
Benedikt
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Mo., 23. Mai 2016 um
17:23 Uhr:
> It
For the record, I voted +1, too.
Oliver
Am 26.05.2016 um 21:35 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> This vote passes with the following votes:
>
> - Gary Gregory: +1
> - Jochen Wiedmann: +1
> - Benedikt Ritter: +1
> - Stian Soiland-Reyes: +1
> - Bernd Eckenfels: +1
>
> I'll continue with the release proc
Oliver Heger schrieb am Do., 26. Mai 2016 um
21:56 Uhr:
> For the record, I voted +1, too.
>
Yes, sorry! Must have missed that when counting votes.
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 26.05.2016 um 21:35 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> > This vote passes with the following votes:
> >
> > - Gary Gregory: +1
> > - Joc
12 matches
Mail list logo
