FTR, I went back to the 2.1 tag and tested 'mvn clean test' on Windows 10
and Maven 3.5.0 and got:
- Oracle Java 1.7.0_80: PASS
- Oracle Java 1.8.0_144: PASS
- Oracle Java 9 release: FAIL in the same way.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello
Due to the -1 VOTE from Benedikt, I am canceling this VOTE and will roll
out RC2 ASAP.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I also had not considered building on Java 9 since Java 9 has made such a
> mess with backward compatibility and a lot of
I also had not considered building on Java 9 since Java 9 has made such a
mess with backward compatibility and a lot of Maven plugins fail on Java 9.
Gary
On Oct 1, 2017 04:12, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> - signatures are good
> - Release notes look good
> -
As Pascal noted on this thread, these test failures happen only on
non-Windows systems and the tests have since been patched. I will wait
until tomorrow to consider canceling this vote as I am AFK until then.
Gary
On Oct 1, 2017 04:12, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
Hello Gary,
Hello Gary,
- signatures are good
- Release notes look good
- Website looks good
With Java 7 and Java 8 I get these test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
ZipFileObjectTestCase.testReadingFilesInZipFile:98->readAndAssert:61
great, thank you!
Gary
On Sep 30, 2017 10:04, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
>
> > Am 29.09.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Gary Gregory :
> >
> > Would a few of you please find the time to review this RC?
>
> Sorry for the delay. I will take a look tomorrow.
> Am 29.09.2017 um 15:47 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> Would a few of you please find the time to review this RC?
Sorry for the delay. I will take a look tomorrow. Preparing IO 2.6 RC1 took
longer than I thought…
Benedikt
>
> Thank you in advance for your input,
> Gary
Would a few of you please find the time to review this RC?
Thank you in advance for your input,
Gary
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons VFS 2.1 was released,
May I please have more VOTEs?
Thank you in advance for your review,
Gary
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons VFS 2.1 was released, so I would like to release
>
Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10 (I don't get any
test failures). Artifacts and site look good.
Some findings:
- Both source and binary distribution use the same top-level folder.
- The site has two checkstyle reports. One is empty, the other one
contains some warnings which
On travis-ci there are three unit test failures for the build of the tag:
ZipFileObjectTestCase.testReadingFilesInZipFile
ZipFileObjectTestCase.testReadingOneAfterClosingAnotherFile
ZipFileObjectTestCase.testReadingOneAfterClosingAnotherStream:see:
My +1
Gary
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons VFS 2.1 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons VFS 2.2.
>
> Apache Commons VFS 2.2 RC1 is
apache.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2017 5:43:03 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS 2.2 from RC1.
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons VFS 2.1 was released, so I would l
reg...@apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2017 5:43:03 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS 2.2 from RC1.
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
since Apache Commons VFS 2.1 was released, so I would like to release
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
since Apache Commons VFS 2.1 was released, so I would like to release
Apache Commons VFS 2.2.
Apache Commons VFS 2.2 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/ (svn revision
15 matches
Mail list logo