[VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-26 Thread sebb
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.2 based on RC1. [ ] +1 release it [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_2_RC1/ (r1413727) site: http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.2-RC1/ The Javad

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-26 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi, I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases? I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it still breaks BC. Are sure we want that? Are the removed methods confusing in a way that can be construed as keeping them being a bug? Gary On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-26 Thread sebb
On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi, > > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases? Yes. > I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it still > breaks BC. Are sure we want that? Are the removed methods confusing in a > way that can be constru

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-27 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good. Minor nits: - The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate. - There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to encoding issues, so I guess this is nothing critical. +1 Oliver Am 26.11.2012 19:

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-27 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good. > > Minor nits: > - The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate. > Patches? ;) > - There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to > encod

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-11-27 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: > On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases? > > Yes. > > > I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it > still > > breaks BC. Are sure we want that?

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-12-01 Thread sebb
On 28 November 2012 06:29, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases? >> >> Yes. >> >> > I understand that the removed methods are not in core c

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-12-01 Thread sebb
On 26 November 2012 18:29, sebb wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.2 based on RC1. > > [X] +1 release it > [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care > [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... Adding my vote. > tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_2_RC1/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-12-01 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:04 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 November 2012 06:29, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases? > >> > >> Yes.

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.2 based on RC1

2012-12-01 Thread sebb
On 1 December 2012 22:14, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:04 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 28 November 2012 06:29, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote: >> > >> >> On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > I thought we h