On 1 December 2012 22:14, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 28 November 2012 06:29, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I thought we h
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 November 2012 06:29, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases?
> >>
> >> Yes.
On 26 November 2012 18:29, sebb wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.2 based on RC1.
>
> [X] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
Adding my vote.
> tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_2_RC1/
>
On 28 November 2012 06:29, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > I understand that the removed methods are not in core c
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases?
>
> Yes.
>
> > I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it
> still
> > breaks BC. Are sure we want that?
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
>
> Minor nits:
> - The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate.
>
Patches? ;)
> - There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to
> encod
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
Minor nits:
- The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate.
- There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to
encoding issues, so I guess this is nothing critical.
+1
Oliver
Am 26.11.2012 19:
On 26 November 2012 19:08, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases?
Yes.
> I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it still
> breaks BC. Are sure we want that? Are the removed methods confusing in a
> way that can be constru
Hi,
I thought we had a policy to keep BC for minor releases?
I understand that the removed methods are not in core classes but it still
breaks BC. Are sure we want that? Are the removed methods confusing in a
way that can be construed as keeping them being a bug?
Gary
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.2 based on RC1.
[ ] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_2_RC1/ (r1413727)
site:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.2-RC1/
The Javad
10 matches
Mail list logo