Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] Running the source distribution through my compiler zoo. JRockit 1.5 fails still (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/109929/focus=109945), but we agreed already last time to ignore that. Building with Ant/IBM

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Hi, I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be provided with the build or with Ant? When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x syntax whereas other 4.x (way easier to

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: Hi, I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be provided with the build or with Ant? When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Jorg, When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x syntax whereas other 4.x (way easier to use I think). I would advocate for the generalisation of Junit 4.x tests whenever possible. Well, I think no one is against this, unless somebody does the work ;-) However, this

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: Jorg, When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x syntax whereas other 4.x (way easier to use I think). I would advocate for the generalisation of Junit 4.x tests whenever possible. Well, I think no one is against this, unless

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Jorg, With Ant 1.7.0 all tests pass for me also. It seems that Ant 1.6.5 simply does not yet support JUnit 4.x OOTB. Are we supposed to guarantee backward compatibility that old? Regards, Dim. Dimitri Pourbaix

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: Jorg, With Ant 1.7.0 all tests pass for me also. It seems that Ant 1.6.5 simply does not yet support JUnit 4.x OOTB. Are we supposed to guarantee backward compatibility that old? No. However, it might be good to add an echo task explaining that the JUnit 4.x

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Jörg Schaible a écrit : Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: Hi, I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be provided with the build or with Ant? When I was updating SVD, I noticed that

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: Jörg Schaible a écrit : Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: Hi, I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be provided with the build or with Ant? When I was updating

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2010, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Luc Maisonobe wrote: Jörg Schaible a écrit : Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: Hi, I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x.

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled with the binary distribution:

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Dimitri Pourbaix
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled with the binary distribution:

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Michael Heuer
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled with the binary distribution:

RESULT: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-30 Thread Phil Steitz
This vote has passed with +1 votes from Luc Maisonobe * Niall Pemberton * Henri Yandell * Bill Barker * Jörg Schaible * Sebastian Bazley * Phil Steitz * Dimitri Pourbaix Michael Heuer and no other votes. Thanks to all who helped prepare, review and improve this release! Phil * = Commons PMC

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-29 Thread Phil Steitz
Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-28 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled with the binary distribution:

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
Everything looks good except I have one question about the LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't see anything related to that in the LICENSE file - what license is/was that code? Niall On Sun,

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: Everything looks good except I have one question about the LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't see anything

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-28 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Niall Pemberton a écrit : Everything looks good except I have one question about the LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't see anything related to that in the LICENSE file - what license

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-28 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:31 PM To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3 Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags

[VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

2010-03-27 Thread Phil Steitz
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled with the binary distribution: