On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Am 11.07.2017 um 06:55 schrieb Simon Spero :
> >
> > Since it's an interface, I could change it to IHasACharset?
> >
> > Or If you prefer I could rename it to YouGiveLove? (Lucky Millenials-
> you
> > aren't headsonged)
>
>
Hello,
> Am 11.07.2017 um 06:55 schrieb Simon Spero :
>
> Since it's an interface, I could change it to IHasACharset?
>
> Or If you prefer I could rename it to YouGiveLove? (Lucky Millenials- you
> aren't headsonged)
I recommend to leave this kind of irony out of mailing list communication. T
HasCharset is certainly bad and also CharsetAccessor sounds like class name
not as Interface , I think Charsetable CharsetAccesable or CharsetAware Is
better as Interface name.
Regards,
Amey
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017, 3:33 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> I renamed HasCharset to CharsetAccessor (until someo
Since it's an interface, I could change it to IHasACharset?
Or If you prefer I could rename it to YouGiveLove? (Lucky Millenials- you
aren't headsonged)
The name follows a pattern for interfaces of this sort, which are basically
retrofit markers for the presence of property, (with associated ge
the book! ;-)
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> The colour, dish, or liqueur? Or mountains apparently.
>
> On 10 July 2017 at 17:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> >
> > > Charsetable? CharsetAware? ;P
> > >
> >
> > Chartreus
The colour, dish, or liqueur? Or mountains apparently.
On 10 July 2017 at 17:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> > Charsetable? CharsetAware? ;P
> >
>
> Chartreuse? ChartreuseDeParme?
>
> Gary
>
>
> >
> > On 10 July 2017 at 17:03, Gary Gregory wrot
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Charsetable? CharsetAware? ;P
>
Chartreuse? ChartreuseDeParme?
Gary
>
> On 10 July 2017 at 17:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > I renamed HasCharset to CharsetAccessor (until someone comes up with a
> > better name before 1.15.)
> >
> > Gary
Charsetable? CharsetAware? ;P
On 10 July 2017 at 17:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I renamed HasCharset to CharsetAccessor (until someone comes up with a
> better name before 1.15.)
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Bodewig
> wrote:
>
> > On 2017-07-05, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> >
I renamed HasCharset to CharsetAccessor (until someone comes up with a
better name before 1.15.)
Gary
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2017-07-05, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > The new interface name HasCharset is pretty bad IMO.
>
> fair enough.
>
> > CharsetProvider is
On 2017-07-05, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The new interface name HasCharset is pretty bad IMO.
fair enough.
> CharsetProvider is the obvious (to me) better name even though there
> already is a class called java.nio.charset.spi.CharsetProvider.
I don't think so, this really is a marker interface for
Supplied and Provider are both good.
Gary
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Jeremy Gustie <
jgus...@blackducksoftware.com> wrote:
> CharsetSupplier?
>
> -Jeremy
>
> > On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The new interface name HasCharset is pretty bad IMO.
> >
CharsetSupplier?
-Jeremy
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> The new interface name HasCharset is pretty bad IMO.
>
> CharsetProvider is the obvious (to me) better name even though there
> already is a class called java.nio.charset.spi.CharsetProvider.
>
> Alter
Hi All,
The new interface name HasCharset is pretty bad IMO.
CharsetProvider is the obvious (to me) better name even though there
already is a class called java.nio.charset.spi.CharsetProvider.
Alternatives could be CharsetContainer, CharsetAccessor, CharsetGetter, ?
Gary
13 matches
Mail list logo
