[compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, I did the rest in http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases Checking everything, I figured out that everyting is on http://www.apache.org/dist/commons but not available on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/. http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-compress/commons-compress/ doesn't contain it

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.05.2009 19:24, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > > I did the rest in http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases > > Checking everything, I figured out that everyting is on > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons but not available on > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/. > http://repo1.maven.

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > > I did the rest in http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases > > Checking everything, I figured out that everyting is on > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons but not available on > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/. > http://r

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Thanks Rainer. I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works then. I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just a broker link... right guys? Thanks again, Christian > Concerning the download page: > > I think you need to add the cgi page named

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> Perhaps you just mistyped, but the correlation isn't between > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons and repo1, rather its between > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ and repo1. > Since the artifacts were added to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository a > few hours ago, I'd wait a

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Thanks Rainer. > I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works then. > I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just > a broker link... right guys? > Right. -Rahul

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread sebb
On 21/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Thanks Rainer. > I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works > then. > I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just > a broker link... right guys? The site can be fixed without redoing the vote,

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.05.2009 22:58, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Thanks Rainer. > I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works then. I just noticed another minor glitch in the site docs version at people.apache.org. There is still a file downloads.html, that contains the info "There a

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
thanks, i removed downloads - its not longer necessary cgi works now too :-) Cheers On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 21.05.2009 22:58, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> Thanks Rainer. >> I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works >> then. > > I

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 22.05.2009 00:15, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > thanks, i removed downloads - its not longer necessary > cgi works now too :-) Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the generating style sheet or an an

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-21 Thread sebb
On 22/05/2009, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 22.05.2009 00:15, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > thanks, i removed downloads - its not longer necessary > > cgi works now too :-) > > > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the > generating style sheet or an ant property (I didn't check how the site > is generated). Thanks, but it looks like "know issue": http://wiki.apache.org/co

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-22 Thread Henri Yandell
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a >> green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the >> generating style sheet or an ant property (I didn't check how the site >> is generated). >

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-23 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> Next dev. snapshot is 1.1. > > One has to wonder why we put the version number on the site :) It's > completely meaningless and just leads to confusion. > > I think it dates in Maven from the notion that your site would be your > documentation. However websites serve a completely different purpo

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> Next dev. snapshot is 1.1. > > > > One has to wonder why we put the version number on the site :) It's > > completely meaningless and just leads to confusion. > > > > I think it dates in Maven from the notion that your site would be your > > doc

Re: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release

2009-05-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1. The release was/is fine :) On May 21, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: Thanks Rainer. I did the fix and wait for the mirroring now. Hopefully everything works then. I don't think this does require a new vote, RC, etc. since it was just a broker link... right guys? Thanks aga

[ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-22 Thread sebb
On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a > > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the > > generating style sheet or an ant property (I didn't check how the site > > is generated). > > > Thanks,

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a >>  > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the >>  > generating style sheet or an ant property (I didn't c

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-22 Thread sebb
On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a > >> > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the grey headline, which may come in via the > >> > ge

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>  >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a >>  >>  > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-22 Thread sebb
On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: > >> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, sebb wrote: > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>  >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: >>  >>  > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>  >>  >> > Ano

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-22 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote: > >> > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: > >> >> > On 22

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-22 Thread Henri Yandell
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>  >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a >>  >>  > green "1.1-SNAPSHOT" in the

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: > >> > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:57 PM, sebb wrote: > On 23/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>  >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote: >>  >>  > On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>  >>  >> On Fri, May

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, sebb wrote: On 22/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:08 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> > Another minor glitch I noticed just now. All pages seem to include a >> > green "1.

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-24 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> We're the victims of an experiment that was only half completed imo. >> > > +1.  I tend to remove the development reports when I cut RCs and roll > releases.  I also favor having the www website focussed on current > development, with prior

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-24 Thread Phil Steitz
Henri Yandell wrote: On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: We're the victims of an experiment that was only half completed imo. +1. I tend to remove the development reports when I cut RCs and roll releases. I also favor having the www website focussed on current de

Re: [ALL] fix site doc version so it agrees with release [was: [compress] Two issues with releasing the release]

2009-05-25 Thread Henri Yandell
I realize this thread went the wrong direction. Why the green? Just noticed Taglibs has the same problem (it uses the Commons CSS :) ). Very ugly. Presumably we used to use a different colour and the CSS has been changed? Hen On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:08 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22/05/2009, Christi