I agree with sebb. I prefer an organization where everyone gets one
vote. This is obviously not the only way an organization can run, but
I like neither having a diminished or overwhelming power with my vote.
The best part of having only +1 is that you can't use your merit to
strong-arm decisions o
On 11 August 2011 10:21, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> On 11/08/2011 8:13 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
>> I was going to say: "That would put Sebb in charge of the ASF!!!", but
>> then I noticed that after the import of Jena Andy Seaborne appears to
>> be the top count committer (I know, that doesn't measur
On 11/08/2011 8:13 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I was going to say: "That would put Sebb in charge of the ASF!!!", but
then I noticed that after the import of Jena Andy Seaborne appears to
be the top count committer (I know, that doesn't measure size of
commit). [http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/rep
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 8:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
>
> Thank you for posting this summary of the Apache way. Yes, it is damn
> hard to track contributions, especially if one wishes to do it
> accurately and fairly. However, it is possible and even
strub
--- On Wed, 8/10/11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> From: Christian Grobmeier
> Subject: Re: [general] Apache + Meritocracy [Was: [logging] logging vs slf4j]
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011, 1:47 PM
> > Thank you for posting this
On 10/08/2011 3:59 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
"Creating a branch of commons-digester using SLF4J/jul/log4jv2 will
not convince anyone."
I am sorry, but deciding for other people what they are going to think
is no way to go either.
Experimenting by branching is leading by example. This is a good
o
On 10/08/2011 3:47 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
So, why do you want to measure my coding efficiency? Not even my Boss
(if I would have one) is allowed to do that! Commit points measure my
coding skills probably, not my human skills.
Commit points as described in my blog measure the number of
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> On 10/08/2011 8:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
>>
>>> * On the ASF model
>>>
>>> In a nutshell, while the ASF is a great organization in many ways, it
>>> is not a meritocracy mainly because
> Thank you for posting this summary of the Apache way. Yes, it is damn
> hard to track contributions, especially if one wishes to do it
> accurately and fairly. However, it is possible and even easy to keep
> *approximate* track of contributions, e.g. via "commit points" as
> described in my commi
On 10/08/2011 8:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
* On the ASF model
In a nutshell, while the ASF is a great organization in many ways, it
is not a meritocracy mainly because merit is not measured at all and
at the project level no responsiblity is
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> * On the ASF model
>
> In a nutshell, while the ASF is a great organization in many ways, it
> is not a meritocracy mainly because merit is not measured at all and
> at the project level no responsiblity is accrued on merit beyond
> committersh
11 matches
Mail list logo
