Re: [geometry] 1.0 release (take 2)

2021-08-10 Thread Alex Herbert
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 22:12, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le mar. 10 août 2021 à 21:25, Matt Juntunen > a écrit : > > > > FYI, I'm planning to start the geometry release process within the > > next couple of days instead of waiting for the RNG release as > > mentioned previously. (Geometry only

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release (take 2)

2021-08-10 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mar. 10 août 2021 à 21:25, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > FYI, I'm planning to start the geometry release process within the > next couple of days instead of waiting for the RNG release as > mentioned previously. (Geometry only uses RNG for unit tests and > benchmarks.) The reasons for this

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release (take 2)

2021-08-10 Thread Matt Juntunen
FYI, I'm planning to start the geometry release process within the next couple of days instead of waiting for the RNG release as mentioned previously. (Geometry only uses RNG for unit tests and benchmarks.) The reasons for this change of plans is that (1) I have need of the code in other projects

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release (take 2)

2021-08-02 Thread Alex Herbert
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 02:32, Matt Juntunen wrote: > > > Then, as a matter of preference, I'd still suggest that "Commons RNG" > > be released first (if the latter's next release is pending). > > Ok. Any thoughts on a timeline for that? > I am currently looking at it. The dryRun build of the

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release (take 2)

2021-08-01 Thread Matt Juntunen
PM Alex Herbert wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 16:25, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Le dim. 1 août 2021 à 02:57, Matt Juntunen a > > écrit : > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've addressed a few issues since I la

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release (take 2)

2021-08-01 Thread Alex Herbert
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 16:25, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > Le dim. 1 août 2021 à 02:57, Matt Juntunen a > écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > I've addressed a few issues since I last proposed the commons-geometry > > 1.0 release, namely > > - reduc

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release (take 2)

2021-08-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le dim. 1 août 2021 à 02:57, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hello, > > I've addressed a few issues since I last proposed the commons-geometry > 1.0 release, namely > - reducing the code smells in SonarCloud from 100+ to 8 (mostly by > clearing false positives) and > -

[geometry] 1.0 release (take 2)

2021-07-31 Thread Matt Juntunen
Hello, I've addressed a few issues since I last proposed the commons-geometry 1.0 release, namely - reducing the code smells in SonarCloud from 100+ to 8 (mostly by clearing false positives) and - removing use of checked exceptions in the IO modules (GEOMETRY-138). I've also run fuzz testing

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release

2021-07-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le jeu. 22 juil. 2021 à 01:05, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Alex, you are correct that a large number of the SonarQube issues can > be closed as "won't fix". I've opened INFRA-22130 [1] so I can get > admin access to make those changes. > > Gilles, what do you picture as required in order for

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release

2021-07-21 Thread Matt Juntunen
Alex, you are correct that a large number of the SonarQube issues can be closed as "won't fix". I've opened INFRA-22130 [1] so I can get admin access to make those changes. Gilles, what do you picture as required in order for commons-geometry to be released? Do you see fuzz-testing as a blocker?

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release

2021-07-21 Thread Alex Herbert
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 at 13:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > I'm not really pushing for either of the above two. Instead, we > we should try and clean up everything[1][2] before the first stable > release. > With regard to SonarCloud, Matt are you able to administer the issues on the commons

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release

2021-07-21 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello Matt. Le mar. 20 juil. 2021 à 04:01, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hello, > > commons-numbers 1.0 has now been released so I'd like to release > commons-geometry 1.0 soon. I was going to include the following > modules: > [...] > - commons-geometry-io-core > - commons-geometry-io-euclidean >

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release

2021-07-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le mer. 21 juil. 2021 à 00:35, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Geometry only uses rng for tests and performance benchmarks. Why do we > need to wait for the next release? We don't need to; it's for self-advertisement. ;-) There is largely enough new functionality in [RNG] for justifying a release

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release

2021-07-20 Thread Matt Juntunen
Geometry only uses rng for tests and performance benchmarks. Why do we need to wait for the next release? -Matt J On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:56 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi. > > Le mar. 20 juil. 2021 à 04:01, Matt Juntunen > a écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > commons-numbers 1.0 has now been

Re: [geometry] 1.0 release

2021-07-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Le mar. 20 juil. 2021 à 04:01, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hello, > > commons-numbers 1.0 has now been released so I'd like to release > commons-geometry 1.0 soon. I was going to include the following > modules: > - commons-geometry-core > - commons-geometry-euclidean > -

[geometry] 1.0 release

2021-07-19 Thread Matt Juntunen
Hello, commons-numbers 1.0 has now been released so I'd like to release commons-geometry 1.0 soon. I was going to include the following modules: - commons-geometry-core - commons-geometry-euclidean - commons-geometry-spherical - commons-geometry-io-core - commons-geometry-io-euclidean If there